/meta/ - Board features and moderation feedback

>>1014
Meinten Sie: Entstören

>>1014
Broisen wiederhergesteld.

>>>/b/45695
Spam, persönliche Armee, behinderter Scheißpfosten? Du entscheidest!

>>1019
Why did you ask here? Hardly anyone uses /meta/ besides me

t. frequent-ish banner poster

Ebin /meta/ OC! That's actually handcrafted, is it? If so, then great work, you should definitely post that on the other boards, too.

>>1020
That’s because I am new here, I am a Bernd not a Ernst. But I saw cute Polandballs so I had to make a post here. +it will stay up longer with the less activity

>>1021
>That's actually handcrafted, is it? If so, then great work.
Danke Ernst, I did indeed make it, I was listening to the radio when I thought of a sad Polandball listening to a song that makes the radio move that’s it’s alive. I have many ideas I try to make into reality.

>you should definitely post that on the other boards, too.
What bored, there’s not too many here. I had posted it on other image boards tho, for example the first post of this gif was on Bernd.group’s music thread.

Gotta start recruiting early

>>1011
Thanks, it is added.

The ECE (Ernstchan Express) does not have any brakes, CHOO CHOO

>>1017
Nice wörk, it is added.

>>886
Oh I see, but it is not there for me. So it's not Ernst, I'm sorry.

Wenn ich einen Pfosten lösche, wurde dann nicht immer der Pfostenzähler auch wieder zurückgesetzt, oder bilde ich mir das gerade nur ein?

>>1006
>Pfostenzähler auch wieder zurückgesetzt
Nö. Vielleicht die Zahl der Faden-Pfosten, falls du Dollchan benutzt.

>>1007
Danke, dachte ich mir schon.

>>>/int/11871
Someone seems to have found a way to bump autosaged threads

>>863
hmm…
>>822
>>830
> sit that one out

Possible bug: I hovered over a quoted post and got it displayed. The file preview for the video showed the options twice.

>>879
Checked, it's likely a bug, I blame shady javascript magic. The controls get injected when the post is displayed first, and when the post is displayed a second time via the internal link, they're injected again, because the script doesn't check for that. However, since I'm lazy and incompetent, and it's just a cosmetical problem, I'd rather leave it alone.

>>861
Erledigt.

>>>/b/39274

Wirkt verdächtig

>>870
Erledigt.

>>871
Besten Dank. Hab dann auch gleich mal einen neuen Faden eröffnet.
>>872

>>828
Duh, hun :3

Can
>>>/b/35001
thread be made into one of them endless threads that delete the oldest post after reaching 500?
Like the Ukraine threda on Gaycee for example?
Otherwise there will be only Yahtzee left board-wide in a year or 2.

>>832
If it stays this fast, I think this is a sensible idea. I suppose we'll see how it turns out during the next few days.

>>638
Faden wurde gelöscht, bitte um Geduld bei sowas, es sitzt nicht rund um die Uhr einer da und moderiert. Und dass alte Fäden vom Brett fallen, ist so gewollt. Wir sind ein Bilderbrett, und keine Enzyklopädie.

>>639
Schon klar und ich bedanke mich auch für eure freiwillige Arbeit! (Die jetzt wohl leider sehr viel meer Zeit in Anspruch nehmen wird. )
Eine extra Titte als Dank.

Es wächst halt die Angst das sich das Geschwür einbildet hier bleiben zu können wenn nicht konsequent und zeitnah eingegriffen wird.

Auch klar, dass wir hier ein Bilderbrett und kein Wiki oder ähnliches sind ich war aber über das langsame Tempo immerschon froh und hab dementsprechend auch regelmäßig ewig alte Fäden gelesen oder mir Qualitätsbilder von dort geholt.

Ich weiß auch das Veränderung manchmal zwangsläufig passiert, Veränderung ist trotzdem in 95% der Fällen Scheisse.

Also falls sich die Neuernste zumindest benehmen können oder gerügt werden, ists ja okay aber wenn hier bald das Tempo von anderen Bilderbrettern Einzug findet (und gewollt ist) wird die Qualität und Gemütlichkeit drunter leiden.

I know the 4chongs has something implemented so that bumps only work for consecutive posts of unique IPs, i.e. if nobody but OP is replying nothing happens.
Of course that can be circumvented by new IPs.

Sounds good, but trust me, it's useless. Think of it like this: Any of those posters you have in mind are probably doing this for a while, so they are used to working with different IPs. Just as you say:
>Of course that can be circumvented by new IPs.
Everyone and their grandma has those today. Even if people do it with clear IPs, those also usually change periodically, even outside /24-range. There might even be good reasons for an OP to bump old threads, like rescuing a quality thread from falling off the board, or reviving one instead of creating a similar one.

>but it would help to get rid of Threads like the KrahThread on /b/
If we wanted to do that, we would have simply removed it. It's not forbidden to talk about politics on EC, we just don't want to have political shilling, namecalling and stuff like this. Obviously, we would have preferred the thread to have a more "general" topic, but as long as politics discussion stays in the thread and stays civil, there is no reason to remove it. In general, we aim to rather remove cancerous posters than forbid whole topics, knowing well that there might be a limit to that approach. But as a byproduct, that also prevents people trying to shit up threads in order to have them removed because they "attract cancer".