No.22492
There’s nothing less sexy than a German woman speaking English.
No.22495
>>22492Funny, I always hear people raving on about Katja Kassin's accent
No.22497
>>22487> MesopotamianDo we have any reason not to think that Gilgamesh was invented by Brits? No one heard of him in the Middle East until 19 century, when European archeologists arrived.
No.22498
>>22497Interesting point.
By developing that thought further, we can also assume that jews didn't exist until the 19th century, since their stories that supposedly date back to around 1000 BC have clearly been adaptations of sumerian tales.
No.22499
>>22498Anglos knew about Old Testament (Torah) and made up Sumerian lore in accordance to it.
No.22500 KONTRA
>>22497Galkovsky's strongest soldier
🫡
No.22503
>>22499Orrrr.... did anglos make up judaism to have a way of baiting germans into adopting an easy scapegoat, which they then could use to help "take back their land" and gaining a foothold in the middle east while simultaneously being able to destroy Germany through a war waged because of their treating of that scapegoat?
Think about it. Perfidous albion built the first concentration camps, btw.
No.22504
What's your SMV, Ernst?
No.22505 KONTRA
>>22504The one where I make posts with random acronyms and assume everybody knows what I am talking about.
Yes, I am a bit retarded.
No.22507
Magical mammaries
Beautiful breasts
Titillating tits
Magnificent melons
Bewitching boobies
Joyous jugs
Sublime secondary sex characteristics
Heavenly hooters
Comely chest
That's all english synonyms for breasts I can think of
In short, I love them. Love seeing them, touching them, tasting them, licking them, massaging them, rubbing my face on and between them, feeling them on my skin. It's good I'm not a girl, or I would do nothing but fondling myself.
No.22508
>>22505Which means you will be or are excluded from the most serious discussions there are atm, bro.
No.22509
>>22504Yours is incel or you wouldn't ask.
No.22511
>>22510I tried the test and the result was
undefined No.22512
>>22503No, I don't think that Judaism was invented by Anglos. Also it's me who is the tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist, so it's me who should use such sophism: "Oh, you believe in evolution? You must also believe that you grandma was a monkey!".
And you're a reasonable logical person. Don't break your role.
> baiting germans into adopting an easy scapegoatSometimes they do it, yes. Just look at official version of how George Soros acquired his wealth. And try to propose a simpler explanation.
No.22513
>>22512> "Oh, you believe in evolution? You must also believe that you grandma was a monkey!".That's just a misunderstanding of how evolution works, not a conspiracy theory.
No.22514
>>22513That's the same fallacy as you did: exaggerating and distorting someone's point.
No.22515
>>22514Wrong. There was no distortion and exaggeration, just extrapolation. Those are very different things.
A distortion would be the claim that all history before your birth is fabricated.
I mean, how can you prove the second world war even happened? Were you there?
No.22517
>>22516If I were neurotypical, would I be here?
Thought so.
Checkmate, atheists.
No.22520
>>22509Mine is laid back
because I am getting laid shitposter, so high value individual.
No.22521
>>22514These are rhetorical devices, though.
No.22523
>>22522Will their be one devoted to asses, though?
No.22526
i always roll my eyes when some kind of big name in the entertainment industry or art turns out to be a scumbag, and people are surprised, disappointed, ashamed that they ever "liked them", etc
like why did you "like them" in that capacity at all?
there is a sense of sacrality to art in our ideology, art is seen as some kinda pure, transcendent work and it's hard to believe that people involved in the manufacturing of it could be bad people, or at least they're given the benefit of the doubt compared to any other rich or powerful person
and why would you develop a sentimental fondness for a person whose job is essentially that of a manager at a film set, who yells at and coordinates people
I think this "cult of the artist" we've got going on is cringe.
and also people shouldn't act incredulous when somebody says they don't listen to music or watch films or whatever. absolutizing any kind of phenomenon as part of "human nature" is dumb. the idea of painting pictures on a canvas and then hanging them up is, historically and geographically, an incredibly niche, recent, and ultimately short lived phenomenon.
the way we experience music today as atomized individual listeners, also is
fuck art and artists, the soviet union was right to put them in their place and curtail their "freedom of expression", fuck em
No.22527
hm, I kind of had an outburst there at the end
i think my point is that undue social cachet is given to artists, art should be understood as primarily a social phenomenon, rather than a communion with the individual artist/s
No.22528
Your assessment would be much more plausible if people hadn't been painting stuff for ever since people existed. If it's stone or skin or canvas is irrelevant.
No.22531
>>22527> i think my point is that undue social cachet is given to artistsI think it was Gene Simmons of Kiss who said that he didn't understand why people would listen to artists for election recommendations, and he has a point. Why would they have a clue? Since successful artists are a minority, it makes no sense adopting their choices, because their life reality is different from that of most other people. The fact that election endorsements by artists (or sports stars, celebrities in general) have any effect at all does make democracy look bad.
No.22532 KONTRA
>>22526I think this entire issue stems from the fact that "creating good art" became a preconditon of having the politically "correct" opinions for large swathes of people, though I have seen liberals condemn art because of the artist more often than chuds, who tend to do the reverse and use their art to criticise a person. (But ultimately it comes down to the political, really.)
In a sense this is kinda close to the USSR's approach it is not enough that you are "not against us" and write silly little books about good people, you need to be "with us" and need to "fight for peace" and sit in boring CPSU local meetings for 30 years to be showered with success. (As V. Voinovich put it anyway.)
The author is undead. His views matter, but when his views and interpretations of his own work become an issue (disagreeing with "media literate" interpretations), they can be explained away as "he himself not understanding his work" (see how Tim Cain was booed for saying Fallout wasn't about capitalism) or just completely throwing out any association with "the media" he created.
No.22533
It's disgusting how pseudo-profound all of you are.
No.22534
>>22532the missing thing here is understanding art as a social phenomenon, rather than a direct line from artist, or piece of art, to viewer.
both the opinions of the artist and trained "media understanders" are irrelevant, it's how society as a whole understands the art, which is why all western pop culture is functionally fascist regardless of intent or content
>>22528whether it's stone, skin or canvas is quite relevant
in fact, it might be the most relevant thing
No.22535
>>22533Welcome to EC, newfriend. Please enjoy your stay.
No.22536
>>22534>in fact, it might be the most relevant thingFirst of all, I am not a artist. If it's ass, mouth or vagina is irrelevant.
The most relevant thing is that I fucked your mother.
No.22538 KONTRA
>>22535This is just brick, right?
No.22543
>>22536it's relevant in the sense that it changes the mode in which people engage with the art
people relate differently to art when it's painted on a cave wall that is also your home that is also your family's home, which is the same thing as your "tribe", which is also the entirety of "society"
vs art that is hung up in a museum in the urban center, or decorating a church, or in someone's private collection
No.22544
>>22543Elaborate on that.
No.22547
Sea fruit, fruti die Mare, Meeresfrüchte.
Do other languages also hint at living beings from under water as fruits?
Why fruits? Because of the similar consistency? Slipperiness?
No.22549
>>22547>Sea fruit, fruti die Mare, Meeresfrüchte.There's really not much I don't eat, but Sea Fruit is very high on my shitlist. And yes, the name makes no sense. Imagine calling a wild boar "forest fruit".
No.22550
>>22548I wasn't aware that strawberries, bananas and apples are harvested in the San Andreas Fault.
No.22552
>>22547Seestachelbeere for a kind of jellyfish, I think.
Other than fruit, odd words for sea animals include "sea vaginas" (
Seescheiden) for Ascidiacea, and I think I've seen what would literally translate to "penis fish" (
peniszhál?) being used for a similar animal but can't confirm because the search engine bombards me with penis pictures, anyway that spelling is not on Wikipedia so it's probably wrong or just something somebody made up because they didn't know the proper name.
And "water meat" for "fish".
>>22550I don't understand what any of you are talking about, but the San Andreas Fault is mostly devoid of
Meeresfrüchte. I'd expect some harvesting of strawberries, apples and avocados instead.
No.22553
>>22549> wild boarMore like snails and bigger bugs, like cockchafers and their larvae. Of course, it is still common to eat snails in France and South Western Germany.
No.22554
>Germans in charge of talking about anything that isn't intellectual farthuffing
Always funny, but what exactly is it about /int/ that attracts you people?