No.9271 KONTRA
>>9269They miss you on .xyz
No.9287
A new references compilation is in the works. Changes so far:
- [T&A] Dropped 10.1071/SH14225 & PMID 30461344 & 10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.024 & PMID 25466233 & 10.1002/car.1092
- [T&A] Added 10.1177/1059840514563313 & PMC4810035 & 10.1177/2374623816668275 & PMC8474329 & reintroduced 10.1111/jcom.12201
One or more sources may be added to AR1-3 and/or P&I covering reports that 4cm/40mm-wide insertion during transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) causes permanent damage to the internal anal sphincter (IAS) muscle: probably a width significantly less than some might believe could cause such damage. Repeated TEM can result in fecal incontinence, possibly due to cumulative muscle damage arising from that 4cm dilatation. One source already included in the references compilation, PMID 24105004, points this out: "The prevalence of injury to sphincter muscles is significantly greater in the incontinent patients than in the controls. Eighty-five percent of patients but only 9% controls reveal damage to ≥2 of the 3 muscles of the anal sphincter complex." The anal sphincter complex is comprised of the internal anal sphincter, external anal sphincter, and puborectalis.
"... de novo [newly-occurring] or worsening of fecal incontinence was also reported in several studies assessing TEM [transanal endoscopic microsurgery] included in this review [17, 18, 23, 30]. This could be explained by sphincter damage caused by anal dilation during the surgery with the rigid TEM rectoscopes or platforms that are 4 cm wide [19]."
"Systematic review of functional outcomes and quality of life after transanal endoscopic microsurgery and transanal minimally invasive surgery: a word of caution." International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 2020 Jan; 35(1): 51-67. doi:10.1007/s00384-019-03439-3. (PMID 31761962) Epub 2019 Nov 25.
"According to some studies [11, 12], the internal anal sphincter (IAS) is a critical structure in terms of damage during TEM [transanal endoscopic microsurgery]. A dilatation of anal sphincter complex caused by the insertion of rigid proctoscope of a large diameter and exposure of smooth muscle to prolonged stretching leads to direct trauma and interruption of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR). Zhang et al. [13] confirmed this by the endorectal ultrasound, which was done in patients with anal incontinence after repeated TEM. A disruption of the IAS was detected in 8 of 21 patients (38.1%), while integrity of the external anal sphincter was preserved in all cases."
"The other factor not evaluated in our study but also which may affect the function is open or closed management of the rectal defect after TEM. In spite of no difference in the functional outcomes, Altaf et al. [14] noticed a significant difference in post-TEMS Fecal Incontinence Severity Index scores with worsening function in patients with closed rectal defect (P=0.02)."
"Though all these studies are apparently statistically underpowered, the authors agreed that, regardless of risk factors, dysfunction in most patients is temporary, and anal function recovers within a few months after surgery. It was demonstrated in a systematic review of the literature, which includes 29 studies with results of treatment of 1,297 patients, who were operated on by means of TEM or transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS). Almost unanimously, the researchers come to the conclusion of the minimal effect of TEM on the QoL. Undesirable functional sequelae are regarded as temporary in most patients. However, even temporary dysfunction can affect QoL and should not be underestimated. The authors of the systematic review reported the infeasibility of a meta-analysis due to significant heterogeneity of studies and the absence of a comparison group [15]."
"Does transanal endoscopic microsurgery affect rectal function?" Annals of Coloproctology. 2023 Aug; 39(4): 326-331. PMC10475803. doi:10.3393/ac.2022.00220.0031. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
No.9324
>>9287Those studies were dropped only to make room; since the references compilation is comprised of separate named quote collections that are maintained primarily as an image with two sides, only so much text can fit without reducing the font size to something undesirably small. There most certainly is sufficient "trends" material for a second T&A collection, and perhaps even a third. At least a second T&A collection may be created at some point, but that's a ways off into the future at this stage, so churn is to be expected for T&A in particular.
The newly-introduced studies will be quoted in future posts. Here's the reintroduced study that was included in the past:
"Whether pornography consumption is a reliable correlate of sexually aggressive behavior continues to be debated. Meta-analyses of experimental studies have found effects on aggressive behavior and attitudes. That pornography consumption correlates with aggressive attitudes in naturalistic studies has also been found. Yet, no meta-analysis has addressed the question motivating this body of work: Is pornography consumption correlated with committing actual acts of sexual aggression? 22 studies from 7 different countries were analyzed. Consumption was associated with sexual aggression in the United States and internationally, among males and females, and in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. Associations were stronger for verbal than physical sexual aggression, although both were significant. The general pattern of results suggested that violent content may be an exacerbating factor."
"A Meta‐Analysis of Pornography Consumption and Actual Acts of Sexual Aggression in General Population Studies." Journal of Communication. 2015 Dec 29; 66(1): 183-205. doi:10.1111/jcom.12201.
No.9403
"... pornography is widely perceived as non-threatening and harmless because it is seen as fiction (MacKinnon, 1984), and, arguably, its influence is often underestimated. Yet, the effects that this large exposure, at increasingly younger ages, is having on society is concerning. For instance, for a large number of children and young people, including girls and young women, pornography now plays a key role in their sexual education (Lim et al., 2017). Some of the most popular categories accessed through pornographic websites include violence and aggression toward (young) women (Bridges et al., 2010), and research has shown that frequent exposure to pornography increases the likelihood of engagement in risky sexual behaviors, self-objectification, and endorsement of rape myths (Flood, 2009; Tylka & Kroon Van Diest, 2015). Despite increasing evidence that mainstream pornography is misogynistic and harms women (MacKinnon, 1984; Tyler, 2011) and that its content is becoming more and more extreme, radical feminist arguments against it are often labeled as “sex-negative” (Jensen, 2016, p. 4), while pornographic materials remain widely available and easily accessible, particularly on the web (Ezzell et al., 2020). As a matter of fact, at the time of writing, pornographic websites such as PornHub.com feature among the top 30 websites in the United Kingdom and is more popular than the U.K. government website (“Top Sites in UK,” 2020). Arguably, it is this very widespread availability and ease of access that has contributed to the establishment of pornography as a mainstream, widely accepted, and normalized form of “harmless fiction.”"
... "Reducing women to objects in pornography is a precondition to make the violence they endure look acceptable. When women stop being people, acts of violence against them stop being harmful, as objects cannot be harmed. The legitimation of VAW [violence against women] in pornography is also supported by two latent assumptions. First is the idea that pornography is a “distortion, reflection, projection, expression, fantasy, representation or symbol” (MacKinnon, 1984, p. 326) of reality and, therefore, not real. Yet, “fantasy expresses ideology” (MacKinnon, 1984, p. 327); it expresses the reality of the subordination of women entrenched in the way we understand sex, in and out of pornography. In fact, the second assumption that legitimizes VAW in pornography– that is, that “women enjoy sexual mistreatment” (Dines, 2010, p. 64), consent to their own humiliation, and never say “no” to degrading acts– shows how eroticization and women’s subordination are strictly connected, with the latter becoming “socially real” through its enactment in pornography (MacKinnon, 1984, p. 327). The illusion of consent covers the sexist nature of these acts and allows the refusal of sex not only to become indistinguishable from the desire of sex, but also normalized and eroticized. In pornography, even women’s “no” is part of the fantasy, and force is no longer seen as force “because it is inflicted on women and called sex” (MacKinnon, 1984, pp. 340–343). Under this pretense, almost everything becomes justifiable, including degrading and violent acts such as shoving a woman’s head down the toilet, gagging her, or making her ingest her own vomit. While women become powerless in pornography—as willing actors who ask to be acted upon—men become powerful and always obtain as much sex as they want, how they want it. For a short time, men “get to see what life would look like if only women unquestionably consented to men’s sexual demands” (Dines, 2010, p. 63)."
"“I Don’t Hate All Women, Just Those Stuck-Up Bitches”: How Incels and Mainstream Pornography Speak the Same Extreme Language of Misogyny." Violence Against Women. 2021 Nov; 27(14): 2709-2734. PMC8474329. doi:10.1177/1077801221996453. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
No.9546
"Examining sexual behaviors specifically, most of the behaviors coded in this study were more common in pornographic scenes coded by Bridges et al. (2000) than in participants’ self-reports. Engaging in double penetration, present in 19% of pornography scenes, was reported by fewer than 3% of our participants. Anal sex, present in 56% of pornography scenes, was reported by less than 30% of our participants."
... "Overall, our results indicate heterosexual men and women who use pornography more frequently are more likely to have tried or have an interest in trying sexual behaviors most frequently seen in pornography. Many of these sexual behaviors involve some level of aggression ranging from light slapping to choking or involve sexual behaviors which can present health consequences to the female body such as double anal penetration or ass-to-mouth. While this study did not find pornography use was associated with an amplification of conventional gendered sexual scripts, use of pornography remains a gendered phenomenon; men are far more likely to watch pornography and more likely to have engaged or want to engage in pornographic sexual behaviors. This may explain the misalignment of men’s and women’s sexual behaviors reported in Table 2. For the smaller number of women who do watch pornography, their sexual scripts are more in tune with men’s; they too are interested in trying or have tried more pornographic behaviors. However, for women, who are most often the targets of the sexually aggressive behavior or are engaged in a sex act that is more taxing on their body, the health concerns implicit in pornographic sex acts are more consequential. This chasm between men and women’s sexual interests and attendant gendered health implications raise concerns related to sex education, consent, and public health."
"Given that the first exposure to pornography is often accidental and unwanted, typically occurring around the age of 12 (Sabina et al., 2008), well before the median age of first intercourse at 17 years (Bozon, 2003), pornography is increasingly an unavoidable source of sexual education. The immense growth in the pornography industry over the past decade (Johnson, 2010) has come about at the same time the public sex education system in the United States has grown more calcified and antiquated (e.g., Stanger-Hall & Hall, 2011). These two trends have left young people without a clear, common, and noncommercialized understanding of sexual health. Perhaps conceptualizing pornography as a public health issue will help propel the development of public sex education programs that address, among other things, pornographic sexual scripts. In so doing, educational efforts can better ensure that all young men and women understand the emotional, personal, and physical implications of sexual requests and consent."
"Sexual Scripts and the Sexual Behavior of Men and Women Who Use Pornography." Sexualization, Media, & Society. 2016 Dec; 2(4): 237462381666827. doi:10.1177/2374623816668275.
No.9636
"One problem with the debate about the potential harms of pornography is that it presupposes all pornography is alike. In actuality, pornography is now available in dozens of genres and is consumed in a wide variety of settings (e.g., alone at home, at school with friends), for a number of different purposes (e.g., for masturbation, to relieve boredom, out of curiosity), and under various conditions (e.g., sober vs. intoxicated, coerced vs. consensual). Consumers of pornography—even youth consumers—differ from one another in terms of culture, preexisting knowledge, attitudes about sex and sexually explicit material, parental monitoring and/or guidance pertaining to pornography, sexual orientation, and personality traits, and these may moderate the impact of pornography on outcomes of interest. Research on the impact of pornography on youth has tended to overlook the diversity of pornographies and oversimplify, potentially leading to incorrect or under-nuanced conclusions about whether, how, and why some forms of sexually explicit material may be impacting the psychology and behavior of some youth."
... "The findings that more than half the sample (56%) reported that they had ever tried a sexual act because they first saw it in pornography, and 54% reported ever watching pornography in order to learn how to do something sexual are consistent with prior studies that have found that some youth use sexually explicit material to learn about sexual organs and functions, the mechanisms of sex, and to further sexual identity development. In addition, the results of this study suggest that being asked to watch pornography together with a dating or sexual partner may be common for some underage youth, and lends support to the contention that the majority of youth who are asked to watch pornography with a partner are subsequently asked to reenact something depicted. This information could inform pornography literacy curricula developed for urban youth of color: the results of this particular study suggest that if your partner asks you to view pornography with him or her, there is a high likelihood that you will also be asked to do something that he or she has seen in pornography. Youth could be taught to be prepared for such requests and to decide where their boundaries are related to particular sex acts in advance. Because less than half of those asked to reenact something from pornography reported feeling happy about being asked (42%), being prepared to be asked may help youth formulate responses that keep them safe. Furthermore, all youth in this sample were younger than the minimum age for viewing internet pornography (i.e., 18 years old), so being induced to watch by a dating partner carried at least some legal risk for both parties. Again, pornography literacy curricula could include information about possible legal risks of inducing a minor to watch sexually explicit internet material. Given that 30% of this sample reported that pornography was their primary source of information about sex, calls to expand the reach of sex education and that pornography literacy be developed as components of it are supported."
"Adolescent Pornography Use and Dating Violence among a Sample of Primarily Black and Hispanic, Urban-Residing, Underage Youth." Behavioral Sciences. 2016 Mar; 6(1): 1. PMC4810035. doi:10.3390/bs6010001. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
No.9810
"Our data revealed that 89% of male Italian high school students and 39% of their female peers are exposed to pornographic materials; half of the exposed students, irrespective of gender, watch materials containing violent or degrading acts toward women. According to the exposed students, female actresses often appear to enjoy the subordination and the violence they are submitted to, a trend corresponding to the main script of pornography (see Bridges, 2010)."
"As demonstrated by experimental and nonexperimental studies, watching violent or demeaning pornographic material is associated with greater objectification of women, more tolerant attitudes toward sexual violence, and more aggressive behavior (Ybarra et al., 2011; see Allen, D’Alessio, & Brezgel, 1995; Bryant, 2009; Malamuth et al., 2000, for reviews and discussion). These results are coherent with the social cognitive theory (Bandura, 1977) and with cultivation theory (Gerbner et al., 1994). Especially during adolescence, exposure to sexually violent/ demeaning material can act as a norm setter, normalizing deviant sex and sexual violence, and may provide scripts that will guide sexual behavior in the future (American Psychological Association [APA], 2007; Gagnon & Simon, 2005; Flood, 2009 and 2010; Marston & Lewis, 2014; Martino et al., 2006). In this sample, 41.5% of male and 34% of female students answered they watch pornography to get information about sex."
"Most of the studies showing links between pornography exposure and an increase in negative attitudes and behavior toward women have concerned young men. Less is known about the impact of these materials on female viewers. In this study, among the young women exposed to violent/ degrading material, half said the porn actresses appear to enjoy both the violence and the subordination. It is possible that these female viewers learn to eroticize the sexual subordination and humiliation of women (Jeffreys, 1990) and to accept certain acts as ‘‘normal’’ in their sexual life. A study shows that sexual practices such as anal heterosexual sex, inspired by pornography, are now widespread among adolescents, although most female respondents did not like them at all (Marston & Lewis, 2014)."
"Factors Associated With Exposure to Violent or Degrading Pornography Among High School Students." The Journal of School Nursing. 2015 Aug; 31(4): 280-90. doi:10.1177/1059840514563313. (PMID 25563576) Epub 2015 Jan 6.
No.10271
"In a recent article, Meagan Tyler (2010) analyses the way the US commercial porn industry talks about its product through the trade paper Adult Video News. Tyler demonstrates that whilst academic debate about pornography has often focused on the margins of the industry, mounting arguments about its progressive potential, the industry itself has talked about its product in terms not dissimilar from the analysis of pornography radical feminists were undertaking in the 1980s. That is, the porn industry explicitly promotes the abuse and degradation of women as part of what pornographic sex is."
... "Porn Shutdown also features an interview with gonzo porn performer Kami Andrews in which she discusses the impact of industrial anal sex on her body, predicting – in matter-of-fact tones – ‘eventually my ass is going to fall out. Eventually, I'm going to be hurt and it won't be able to be fixed.’ Andrews – like many of the other women whose experiences I have referred to – has made contradictory statements about her life in porn, but nowhere is this more explicit than in a blog post from 21 January 2006..."
... "In this one post, Andrews describes being brought in to a film to replace an injured woman, recounts how after her own rectal tear the instruction was to clean up and keep filming, and then – so as not to vilify the company she was working for that day – describes what appears to be an earlier experience of working with a woman experiencing a first-term miscarriage. Andrews' account – whilst perhaps an extreme example – is nevertheless generic in her rationalisation of her experience within discourses of ‘sex’ and ‘work’. At the beginning of the post, her injury is immediately contextualised relative to an altogether happier experience in her second scene which, she writes, resulted in her ‘coming a zillion times’. Whilst clearly hyperbolic, this statement functions to reposition both scenes in relation to her sexuality which is reinforced in the second paragraph when the ‘problem’ with the first scene is identified as her lack of arousal. As Williams (1989) has argued, the authenticity of women's arousal is not something that porn can easily visually establish and it is perhaps not surprising, then, that so many accounts of and by female performers endlessly return to this question. As in [the] Andrews account here, these statements are often ambivalent: claiming arousal and satisfaction, on one hand, whilst re-positioning porn as a ‘job’ in which sex is mundane, boring, difficult and devoid of desire on the other. But, Andrews argues, this job brings her more rewards than other options open to her. As such, these experiences become recast as a hazard of a career she (and the other women) has chosen. They are to be understood as the cost of her choices rather than as abusive actions or as the consequences of a demand for increasingly brutal product. Indeed, in her final sentence she assumes the responsibility for the physical injury sustained: she failed to adequately prepare for the scene."
No.10272
(continued from the previous post)
"In presenting this material, my concern here is not whether these accounts of female porn performers' lives are ‘true’ in every respect. Indeed, as I have argued, they are often riddled with contradiction and there are at least as many examples – often from the same women and within the same texts – of women speaking positively about the industry. Such contradictory accounts have served the porn industry well in ensuring that the meta-discourse around porn is consistent with the framing of women as unstable, unreliable and, so, justified recipients of degrading and cruel treatment in porn itself. How is the industry to know whether they are really hurting or not?"
"That porn can be profoundly damaging to women is now part of the story the industry tells about itself, to itself (and its actual consumers) through porn industry publications and discussion forums, as well as to the wider world (and potential consumers) through interviews in mainstream media outlets. The acknowledged abuse includes deception and coercion, addictions (usually to drugs or alcohol), and physical and psychological harm from porn as well as the recognition that sexual abuse, neglect, poverty and problems with addiction often drive women into porn in the first place. By reincorporating these stories of abuse back into the story of porn, the industry has been successful in re-framing these stories: work and sex intersect with feminist-inflected arguments about choice and empowerment to render the demand side of the pornographic equation invisible and irrelevant. Porn is a story about women – the relative invisibility of male porn performers in mainstream discourses around porn is but one example of this – and, as such, any problems with porn are for women to sort out. In the mean-time, production and consumption remain untroubled by the moral, ethical or legal dilemmas these accounts should throw up."
"Producing abuse: Selling the harms of pornography." Women's Studies International Forum. 2011 Nov; 34(6): 593-602. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2011.09.002.
No.10350
>>10311> youPeople are welcome to start paying attention and begin actually listening any time.
Logically-fallacious diversionary tactics:
• A red herring is a tangential topic introduced intentionally as a distraction or inadvertently. Trying to create an unrelated discussion about a messenger or claimant (e.g. by introducing alleged personal attributes or asking about unstated opinions) is one _very_ common example.
• An ad hominem logical fallacy involves arguing or implying that some supposed attribute(s) of a messenger or source somehow affects the validity of one or more claims presented when any such characteristic is completely irrelevant — and this is nonsensical for cases in which information originates from others. (Sometimes such characteristics can be relevant: For example, it may be appropriate to question someone's honesty when she makes a claim about herself or her own experiences. However, a better idea may be to mention the anecdotal evidence logical fallacy, i.e. favoring some personal anecdote(s) over evidence based on science and logic.)
• Misrepresentation—introducing a distorted version of something—is another means of creating a diversion. Attacking a fabrication in order to suggest refutal of what was actually presented constitutes a straw man logical fallacy. (A refutation featuring one or more vague, sweeping claims without proof may be related. The burden of proof rests on the claimant.)
It is suggestive of a nefarious agenda and/or psychopathy to purposely and repeatedly try to draw attention away from anorectal anatomy and physiology, rampant anorectal violence, associated traumatic risks, and an epidemic of ignorance and misinformation. These topics, plus the voluminous amount of information from others, are far more important than anything about a lone person trying to raise awareness of them. It is very likely that pornography industries utilize psychopaths as deceitful and manipulative "psyop" agents when some pornography companies already make use of them for perpetration of violence against one or more others.
No.10351 KONTRA
>>10311Ignore the schizo, don't feed him with your attention.
No.10353 KONTRA
>>10351I was writing a post and deleted it again.
All of his copy&pastes are in the *.pdf. - I didn't quite understood why he posted that particular copy&paste as reply; I just tried to help him.
No.10354
>>10350> People are welcome to start paying attention and begin actually listening any time.> It is suggestive of a nefarious agenda and/or psychopathy to purposely and repeatedly try to draw attention away from anorectal anatomy and physiology, rampant anorectal violence, associated traumatic risks, and an epidemic of ignorance and misinformation.>Reddit /r/painalOther subreddits which clearly violate Reddit's policy on violent content quoted below yet strangely [as of 2023/11/21] persist nonetheless: /r/Roughanal /r/DegradingHoles
"Do not post content that encourages, glorifies, incites, or calls for violence or physical harm against an individual (including oneself) or a group of people..."
https://web.archive.org/web/20230719232538/https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/360043513151Also relevant: "Note that health misinformation, namely falsifiable health information that encourages or poses a significant risk of physical harm to the reader, also violates the Rule."
For far too many years now the subreddits mentioned above have been encouraging, glorifying, and inciting anorectal violence in particular that arguably should easily constitute severely criminal behavior when more than one person is involved (at the very least for potentially-lethal outcomes/sequelae). Perhaps people at high levels of Reddit should be held accountable: not only for failing to uphold their own site's policies, but also for enabling the spread of very dangerous violent behavior along with health-harmful falsehoods and omissions facilitating it on subreddits such as /r/sex.
No.10355
>>10350> People are welcome to start paying attention and begin actually listening any time.> It is suggestive of a nefarious agenda and/or psychopathy to purposely and repeatedly try to draw attention away from anorectal anatomy and physiology, rampant anorectal violence, associated traumatic risks, and an epidemic of ignorance and misinformation.>Reddit /r/painalOther subreddits which clearly violate Reddit's policy on violent content quoted below yet strangely [as of 2023/11/21] persist nonetheless: /r/Roughanal /r/DegradingHoles
"Do not post content that encourages, glorifies, incites, or calls for violence or physical harm against an individual (including oneself) or a group of people..."
https://web.archive.org/web/20230719232538/https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/360043513151Also relevant: "Note that health misinformation, namely falsifiable health information that encourages or poses a significant risk of physical harm to the reader, also violates the Rule."
For far too many years now the subreddits mentioned above have been encouraging, glorifying, and inciting anorectal violence in particular that arguably should easily constitute severely criminal behavior when more than one person is involved (at the very least for potentially-lethal outcomes/sequelae). Perhaps people at high levels of Reddit should be held accountable: not only for failing to uphold their own site's policies, but also for enabling the spread of very dangerous violent behavior along with health-harmful falsehoods and omissions facilitating it on subreddits such as /r/sex.
>>10354> health-harmful falsehoods and omissions facilitating it on subreddits such as /r/sexThe PDF is related. Currently commentary on each archive snapshot is being worked on; everything from 202301 and older is more or less done, with some bracketed "TODO" exceptions. Some URLs were changed or dropped as well.
No.10356
>>10355Oops, didn't mean to reproduce the top part. Newsflash: Humans make mistakes.
No.10436 KONTRA
>>10435Parsed through this .pdf and there is a good point that these anal matters are spoken without any care at all of possible health risks. It's just reddit coomers advising bigger anal insertions. I've never truly considered the extent how dangerous these practices can be.
I never liked sticking my benis in a grill's pooper, and never put anything up my ownOP is a tragic figure, a man that holds truth but due to the way he presents it, people disregard him. This feedback loop is what causes him to become more radical and detached from the masses.
OP, when did you first start thinking about anorectal matters?
No.10440 KONTRA
>>10436> I never liked sticking my benis in a grill's [or boi's] pooper,same.
> and never put anything up my ownyou are missing out.
there is a reason for special shaped prostate massagers and why the prostate is called "the male cum-button", "the male g-spot" or "p-spot".
and playing with it isn't gay. there are prolly a lot more cis-normative men liking to play with their prostate than there are gay men in total. - idk if there are statistics to this, though.OP is right, that there are risks, but if you inform yourself, it should be alright.
> OP is a tragic figure, a man that holds truth but due to the way he presents it, people disregard him.OP doesn't hold truth. Let's imagine the following:
there is a fetish for barbed hooked vaginal insertion. either the benis or the bagina; doesn't matter.
there is a reddit and subculture promoting barbed hooked stuff, which causes serious damages to the benis and/or bagina.
OP would be the person claiming all vaginal intercourse is dangerous and ban worthy and he would insult anyone, who is claiming vaginal intercourse can be fun, to be a psychopath.
OP lacks the ability to differentiate between healthy practices and harmful practices.
Another analogy, which is maybe closer to reality, would be:
fat fetish is dangerous and unhealthy, but - because some individuals really like fat people - there is a subculture of promoting unhealthy overeating.
OP would claim, that eating should be banned.
Additionally OP mainly just copy&pastes barely tangible stuff without reacting to discussion partners' points or concerns. That is toxic af behaviour.
OP deserves to be disregarded, even though he has some valid points.
No.10442
>>10436> there is a good point that these anal matters are spoken without any care at all of possible health risks.Indeed, but also some people seem to be intentionally spreading health-harmful disinformation. When they do so repeatedly, especially over the course of many years, it's rather difficult to argue that they're misinformed and spreading misinformation rather than disinformation (of course, it's certainly possible that the misinformed could keep on misinforming people when nobody corrects them, but in some cases intentional malice seems to be very likely). Two such people I've noted are one moderator of Reddit's /r/sex subreddit, alittlebirdy1, along with a pornstar, RubyRyder.
> OP, when did you first start thinking about anorectal matters?Far too many years ago. I dislike it when people try to make the conversation about me, though, since I'm merely one lone person: the issues to which I've been trying to draw people's attention for much too long are vastly greater, being both applicable and important to humanity in general. Some people may well know that, and intentionally try to distract attention away from those significant topics by inappropriately attempting to redirect discussion toward trivial/irrelevant topics and/or trying to smear the messenger. See also: the paste covering logically-fallacious diversionary tactics that far too many people seem to ignore, even when I repost it repeatedly sometimes.
> OP is a tragic figure, a man that holds truth but due to the way he presents it, people disregard him. This feedback loop is what causes him to become more radical and detached from the masses.Maybe the presentation isn't the problem so much as some of the topics covered... Far too many people seem very, _very_ disinclined to think seriously about anorectal subjects at least, much less take serious and effective action to effect positive change for significant issues relating to them.
I suspect that those issues can't be metaphorically swept under the rug forever, though. Societies worldwide, particularly people within government and educational institutions, may well be forced into action at some point — perhaps once the consequences of inaction become impossible to ignore, and probably both much too late and constituting far too little for some (Me? Nah... I don't matter, remember? Sigh).
No.10443
Speaking people ignoring the paste covering logically-fallacious diversionary tactics... Yet again: Ultimately this is not about me.
>>10440> there are risks, but if you inform yourself, it should be alright.As I wrote in different portions of rbocommentary:
Concerning anal intercourse and other significant anoreceptive activities, "done correctly" may not even be possible for a variety of reasons in any receptive person's particular case (due e.g. to one or more preexisting anorectal conditions, a penis that is simply too girthy, etc.), and is likely to be highly impractical in other cases (e.g. how do you determine what constitutes "too rapid" when there are delicate tissues that can be easily damaged without pain not far inside?).
Anal stretching is not safe for anyone with intact anal sphincter complex muscles, nor is insertion of lengthy objects: 1) the internal anal sphincter muscle can be damaged without pain, and 2) colorectal perforation can occur without immediate pain.
> there is a fetish for barbed hooked vaginal insertionI wrote about the red herring logical fallacy in the aforementioned paste.
> Additionally OP mainly just copy&pastes barely tangible stuff without reacting to discussion partners' points or concerns.I recognize when someone is intentionally wasting my time, trying to smear me, put words into my mouth, etc. From the aforementioned paste:
It is suggestive of a nefarious agenda and/or psychopathy to purposely and repeatedly try to draw attention away from anorectal anatomy and physiology, rampant anorectal violence, associated traumatic risks, and an epidemic of ignorance and misinformation. These topics, plus the voluminous amount of information from others, are far more important than anything about a lone person trying to raise awareness of them. It is very likely that pornography industries utilize psychopaths as deceitful and manipulative "psyop" agents when some pornography companies already make use of them for perpetration of violence against one or more others.
No.10444
As I wrote before elsewhere: Humanity stands to gain much from listening to the words of many others to which I've been trying to draw attention. People even could ignore everything I wrote entirely. After all, with the exception of the third paragraph following the two citing the Anatomy & Trauma quote collection, everything I've written in my traumatic risks summaries (three separate ones citing AR1-3, A&T, and P&I) is backed up by many cited sources.
I also posted this before elsewhere (and referenced what I wrote about ridiculously-excessive care in rbocommentary as a potential addition):
> Anal intercourse is very likely, but not absolutely certain, to result in significant anorectal damage to a receptive person.
My rationale for that was explained in an old post of mine (4chan /gif/thread/9488931/#9514792 28 Oct 2016). Here is a slightly modified version:
(Quoting myself)
> At best, anal sex and significant anal-insertive activities accelerate or guarantee the development of anorectal health problems.
That could in theory be untrue if such activities are done with ridiculously excessive care* all the time, every time.
* That includes, but is not limited to: ruling out preexisting anorectal conditions (possibly caused by prior sexual trauma), always using lubricant, avoiding lubricants that irritate/damage the rectal lining, avoiding enemas (all enemas, hyperosmolar or otherwise, probably remove the rectum's protective mucus barrier), always using a condom (particularly in the absence of an enema), never thrusting too rapidly ("too rapid" could vary for different people, at least for the anal tissues), never inserting anything too girthy ("too girthy" also could vary), never using numbing agents (pain indicates that something is wrong — anally, but not rectally), etc.
In practice using ridiculously excessive care is unrealistic — it'd be more of a chore than a pleasure. Furthermore, both ignorance and misinformation are rampant, porn sets a very bad example that some viewers get ideas from, and people with [self-]destructive tendencies are having a field day.
No.10447
>>10443> colorectal perforation can occur without immediate pain.Below are some references for that. One was included in past quote compilations, but it was dropped when the full study became difficult to access. These may be added at some point.
"Colonic perforations may present without immediate perforation-associated pain and tend to have a slower clinical progression, with the development of a secondary bacterial peritonitis or localized abscess formation [16,17] partly due to the relatively neutral and nonerosive nature of the chemical environment within the colon [12]. With some exceptions, peritoneal contamination from intraluminal colonic contents progressively leads to purulent or fecal peritonitis or to the development of an intra-abdominal abscess. Few of the more than 500 different microfloral species in the colon can survive outside their normal environment [12,18]. In fact, only 22 genera of bacteria were isolated from cultures of intra-abdominal fluid collected among 255 patients who had secondary bacterial peritonitis [5,19]. Over 70% of isolates were from the genera Bacteroides, Streptococcus, Escherichia, Peptostreptococcus, and Fusobacterium [5,18,19]."
"Gastrointestinal perforation and the acute abdomen." Medical Clinics of North America. 2008 May; 92(3): 599-625, viii-ix. doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2007.12.004. (PMID 18387378)
"Despite progress in emergency medicine, gastrointestinal tract perforation remains a condition associated with considerable mortality, ranging from 30 to 50% [1, 2]. Clinical presentation varies: oesophageal perforations can present with non-specific symptoms such as acute chest pain, odynophagia and vomiting [2], gastroduodenal perforations typically present with acute abdominal pain [1, 3], whereas colonic perforations tend to follow a slower progression course, presenting with secondary bacterial peritonitis or localised abscess formation [1, 4]. A subset of patients exhibits delayed symptoms, abscess formation that mimics an abdominal mass, or with sepsis [3]."
"Gastrointestinal perforation: clinical and MDCT clues for identification of aetiology." Insights into Imaging. 2020 Feb 21; 11(1): 31. PMC7035412. doi:10.1186/s13244-019-0823-6.
No.10453
>>104521. You and/or one or more others are welcome to do just that. Certainly I'm not the only person who is capable of trying to draw attention to the words of many others.
2. Here's something from yet another old post of mine elsewhere:
The prevalence of health consequences arising from anoreceptive violence may be difficult to estimate, because many people may not wish to discuss anorectal health problems even with medical doctors. Here are the DOIs of relevant studies quoted in images posted in this thread: 10.3109/13814788.2014.899578 (Anorectal Risks 1) 10.1007/s00192-016-3195-1 (Anorectal Risks 3) 10.3748/wjg.v23.i1.11 (Prolapse & Incontinence). Furthermore, there can be other causes of anorectal health problems to which anoreceptive violence can lead, and some people may even lie about the actual cause.
No.10456 KONTRA
>>10453If you translate the information with snappy lines I can use, I can make infographics.
No.10458
>>10456Thanks for the offer; I'll keep it in mind. Feel free to elaborate on what you mean by "snappy lines." I'm leaving for now.
Additionally...
1. I am not irreplaceable. If you are genuine, you should be able to find one or more others willing to help you. As I also wrote elsewhere: Anyone else could take some or all of that information from others to which I've been trying to draw attention and use different tactics. One person can be expected to do only so much. Most certainly I've done plenty already.
2. The study below is quoted in Anorectal Risks 1. Which region(s) of the world do you wish to emphasize? The prevalence of both anoreceptive activities* and their consequences (traumatic and otherwise) can vary by locale.
"There are several potential dangers with anal intercourse including transmission of communicable diseases, mucosal lacerations, faecal incontinence and injury to the anal sphincters. We expect the incidence of anal injuries to increase parallel to the rising prevalence of anal intercourse in homosexual and heterosexual relationships. It is estimated that up to 40% of men and 35% of women engage in heterosexual anal intercourse. Of course the prevalence of this activity varies by demographics and nationalities, ranging from a low of 3.5% of survey respondents in South Korea to a high of 18.5% of survey respondents in France."
"Complete anal sphincter complex disruption from intercourse: A case report and literature review." International Journal of Surgery Case Reports. 2012; 3(11): 565-568. PMC3437385. doi:10.1016/j.ijscr.2012.07.014.
* What's a better general term: anoreceptive activities, anal eroticism, or something else? I tend to favor the first one, but it might not always make sense (e.g. with anal intercourse a penetrative person isn't engaging in reception).
No.10468
>>10443> It is very likely that pornography industries utilize psychopaths as deceitful and manipulative "psyop" agents [...]If you assume I, someone from a different country and culture who speaks in broken english, is one of those "'psyop' agents", you are wrong. I'm not doing such; at least not knowingly.
On the other hand, I assumed you to be a typical prude puritan pilgrim, who fled europe because they were not able to enforce their views onto the general public.
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Puritans_in_North_America> Puritans believed that the state was obligated to protect society from heresy, and it was empowered to use corporal punishment, banishment, and execution.> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puritans> Attempting to force religious and intellectual homogeneity on the whole community, civil and religious restrictions were most strictly applied by the Puritans of Massachusetts which saw various banishments applied to enforce conformity, including the branding iron, the whipping post, the bilboes and the hangman's noose.[115] Swearing and blasphemy were illegal.[115] Merrill, Louis Taylor (1945). "The Puritan Policeman". American Sociological Review. American Sociological Association. 10 (6): 766–776. doi:10.2307/2085847. JSTOR 2085847. Archived from the original on 10 March 2022. Retrieved 10 March 2022.
To rephrase how I understood their philosophy regarding how the world should be:
We know what is right. The state has to enforce our views. Everyone who thinks differently deserves punishment; even punishment of death.
(I wrote here
>>9145 what I think of people who are considering punishment of death as a valid option)
Maybe we both have/had a baseless prejudice towards our discussion partner.
.
> Concerning anal intercourse and other significant anoreceptive activities, "done correctly" may not even be possible for a variety of reasons [...]>>10444> That could in theory be untrue if such activities are done with ridiculously excessive care* all the time, every time.If we assume that every form of sexual anal insertion is unhealthy, I would still not want to enforce a behaviour-law onto society. I don't want to derail or red-herring with the following. I just want to explain my view and reasoning.
We are pretty darn sure that any form of alcohol consumption is unhealthy, yet we still allow drinking in public [god bless
ameri.. germany]. Other things, which are clearly unhealthy, such as smoking, aren't banned as well. I know that most americans do not like the idea of freedom and are much more likely to prefer an authoritative totalitarianism as form of government, but I do believe, that the freedom of the individual is more important. I believe the risks that come with freedom of choice, such as people drinking themselves to death, are way less dangerous as a ruling system, that restricts the individual and forces him to do the "correct" thing.
In regards to sexual anal activity:
the individual should be able to judge for themselves if he wants to take some health risks for percieved pleasure. This is a decision the individual should and has to make. Balancing risks and rewards is a constant struggle and a core aspect of freedom. Taking away this freedom should not be done by any form of government.
I do, however, agree, that there might have arisen a situation in current american culture, which needs some form of intervening. promoting unhealthy practices without any form of disclaimer of potential danger
should not be allowed.
But that is exactly how far I would say the government should intervene: to educate its population.
Enforce a disclaimer. That's it.
In general I would advise the following:
Do not look for laws enforcing the ideal human.
Instead look what laws are ideal for the human.
No.10469 KONTRA
>>10452you can stimulate your prostate - to a much lesser extend - without anal insertion.
you can adapt pressure along your perineum and look if you find an area that "feels good".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perineum [nsfw
? medical pictures., lol]
there are even massagers for the prostate without any anal insertion.
No.10480
I wrote in the previous thread that I would ignore this apparently-German person, or someone very similar. This is my last intentional response to him or her.
>>10468> If you assume I, someone from a different country and culture who speaks in broken english, is one of those "'psyop' agents", you are wrong. I'm not doing such; at least not knowingly.Whether you actually have trouble understanding what was posted is questionable. Your posts bring this to mind (particularly the part about deceit and manipulation):
"People diagnosed with APD [antisocial personality disorder, aka psychopathy] in prison populations act as if they have no conscience. They move through society as predators, paying little attention to the consequences of their actions. They cannot understand feelings of guilt or remorse. Deceit and manipulation characterize their interpersonal relationships."
https://web.archive.org/web/20171002164816/http://www.minddisorders.com/A-Br/Antisocial-personality-disorder.html> I assumed you to be a typical prude puritan pilgrimAs I keep on pointing out, and you continue to ignore: Ultimately this is not about me. I am no prude, but it wouldn't matter even if I were. I'm trying to draw people's attention to the words of many others.
> To rephrase how I understood their philosophy regarding how the world should beThat is yet another red herring.
> If we assume that every form of sexual anal insertion is unhealthy1. No such assertion was made by me. You seem to be putting words into my mouth. That is misrepresentation, which was also mentioned by the paste covering logically-fallacious diversionary tactics included at the end of the OP image.
2. I wrote in the traumatic risks summary specifically about "girthy and vigorous insertions, which are objectively foolish and very likely to be significantly injurious" due to anorectal fragility that was documented in that summary. From yet another old post elsewhere: Homosexual males can engage in other forms of eroticism. Heterosexual/bisexual people can take advantage of an actual (hopefully healthy) vagina, for which the human anorectum is not remotely a suitable substitute even (or, perhaps, ESPECIALLY) in the best of health — and that is exceedingly obvious.
> We are pretty darn sure that any form of alcohol consumption is unhealthyYou are quite fond of those red herrings.
> sexual anal activityThe anus is not a sexual organ, so "anal sex" and similar terms are misnomers. People engage in erotic activities involving the anorectum, so "anal eroticism" is one more appropriate term. Of course, differentiating activities which are unlikely to be traumatic, such as anilingus, from those that are likely to be physically harmful may require clearer wording: one term I use for that is significant anoreceptive activities.
>>10469I wrote specifically about and defined anorectal violence—anoreceptive activity involving a combination of rapid thrusting, considerable girth, and a prolonged duration—in the paste at the very top of the OP image. That is the main concern here, although either of rapid thrusting and considerable girth on its own can cause significant damage as well.
Prostate stimulation may not be relevant. As for pleasure, that's not relevant when someone is trying to draw attention to traumatic risks. I wrote this in yet another old post elsewhere: The fact that an activity is potentially pleasurable doesn't mean it's a good idea.
No.10481
>>10480> the traumatic risks summarySaid summary, included below, is independently supported by three separate named quote collections, Anorectal Risks 1-3.
Traumatic risks of human anoreceptive activities include inflammation; abrasion and tearing; muscle and connective tissue damage; and colorectal perforation. Sequelae may arise, such as hemorrhage/hematoma, hemorrhoidal disease, ulceration, bacterial infection followed by abscess / fistula / life-threatening systemic sepsis, rectal prolapse, fecal incontinence, anal skin tag (remnant of external hemorrhoidal thrombosis, scar tissue from a healed tear, or a sentinel tag for a chronic anal fissure), and anatomic stenosis (narrowing due to constricting scar tissue). One instance of trauma can lead to multiple complications. Cumulative damage and preexisting conditions are concerns too.
~2cm beyond the anal opening at the pectinate/dentate line, the epithelium transitions from stratified squamous (anoderm) to simple columnar in part of the narrow surgical anal canal, continuous with the rectum. This very fragile mucosal lining is easily damaged especially if its mucus barrier is removed by an enema or otherwise impaired. Furthermore, some enemas and lubricants can inflame the lining and even cause it to slough off. Since injury to anorectal mucosa alone is painless due to a lack of somatic innervation, resultant problems may remain undetected with no obvious symptom(s).
Neuromuscular physiology also contributes to anorectal fragility particularly for girthy and vigorous insertions, which are objectively foolish and very likely to be significantly injurious. The involuntary internal anal sphincter relaxes with rectal distension. The puborectalis and external sphincter completely relax when a person bears down, causing hemorrhoidal cushions to engorge and become more susceptible to being injured by frictional sliding, aka shear. The internal hemorrhoidal cushions lack somatic innervation as well.
No.10549 KONTRA
>>10458>1. I am not irreplaceable. If truly just trying to bat for the cause, then I'll be doing my own action.
I am wary of using this thread to work because I know of how people feel towards this topic. I would advise you to sage your posts alongside mine, we don't need the analrectal debate to become EC's most active thread, always at the top with:
It is long past time to address these matters seriously and effectively. I'll take this message to heart, but I once again disagree with the approach, especially on EC. It's too blunt, comedic even. Makes a mockery of what is already a very sensible topic in today's climate. Or any climate, after all, we are talking about the hole we poop from.
Of the prototype image, I know you take issue with the wording "Anal Sex", but I really think this is one that should be used at the very least at an initial stage. "Anal Sex is dangerous for women's health" is more of a catchy and buzz inducing title than what you have put out for the cause of ending anorectal violence.
re: top left portion of the infograph - I've sent e-mails to American colon health associations and I'm awaiting one of them to sign off on such a simple statement as the one in the picture. If what you say is backed by medical literature, it should not be hard, for now it remains censored.
>>10481This is good. These can all be used to make images like the one I have, see I am lazy and idle and I do not spread messages for any cause, not even my own. But I am convinced of how dangerous thinks I have done sexually, which have been normalized to me and even requested by partners contributes to genuine and irreversible(?) anal damage. Give me feedback on the image I have, I might shorten these for others:
Danger of Enemas
(more images on how even if you don't feel pain, damage can be occuring)
>Neuromuscular physiology also contributes to anorectal fragility particularly for girthy and vigorous insertions, which are objectively foolish and very likely to be significantly injurious. See, if we could find a specific number, it would be good. Maybe some expert than could sign off on something like inserting objects larger than [x] into ur anus is extremely dangerous and can result in: x,y,z. I understand you are an American (a great part of your force d'etre related to californian porn industry, not yet mentioning others) so I dunno tell me - do you think it's possible we can official sign off on some of these images?
No.10584
>>10549> If truly just trying to bat for the cause, then I'll be doing my own action. You are welcome to try. Referencing something on Ernstchan for one or more health claims may not be very convincing.
> I am wary of using this thread to work because I know of how people feel towards this topic.So do I, and that is precisely why I won't be saging my own thread. If you wish not to bump this thread too often, consider working quietly on your own. You also could try to find other places and/or other collaborators: contacting medical professionals may be a good idea, but they may expect something in return for their time and/or [professional] advice.
> after all, we are talking about the hole we poop from.Indeed we are, and yet the anus is one of our most important body parts as I noted in a paste at the top of the OP image. Abusing it may result in health repercussions that can be one or more of highly unpleasant, embarrassing, serious (even fatal), chronic, and permanent. It could be argued that many people ought to care more about this particular body part. Part of the problem here I covered in a paste included in the OP image: common prejudices against and denigration of the anus. "Butthurt" is considered to be something insignificant/laughable, "asshole" is a common pejorative term, etc.
> I know you take issue with the wording "Anal Sex", but I really think this is one that should be used at the very least at an initial stage.Keep in mind that the term is not only a misnomer but also can be vague. Some people use it to refer to a wide variety of activities including anilingus, anal fingering, and more. Using "anal sex" temporarily as a placeholder makes sense, but in the long run it might be wiser to use (and possibly define) clearer terms.
> "Anal Sex is dangerous for women's health" is more of a catchy and buzz inducing title than what you have put out for the cause of ending anorectal violence.Maybe so, but then your proposed wording excludes anoreceptive men entirely. Something like "for the receiving person's health" might be better.
> I've sent e-mails to American colon health associations and I'm awaiting one of them to sign off on such a simple statement as the one in the picture.The American medical establishment may not work that way. Rather than seeking official endorsement, a better idea might be to seek or catalyze official action by that establishment and/or others around the world.
> If what you say is backed by medical literatureIf you're uncertain about anything, you can ask me for clarification. Just about everything in my traumatic risks summaries citing AR1-3, A&T, and P&I should be backed up by at least one quoted medical source.
> if we could find a specific number, it would be good.Refer again to what I pointed out in post 10453. I strongly suggest reading at least what I quoted from those studies mentioned: 10.3109/13814788.2014.899578 (Anorectal Risks 1) 10.1007/s00192-016-3195-1 (Anorectal Risks 3) 10.3748/wjg.v23.i1.11 (Prolapse & Incontinence). It also would be a good idea to read at least everything I quoted on the left side of Trends & Associations (the "trends" portion).
No.10729
"Longitudinal linkages between intentional exposure to x-rated material and sexually aggressive behavior were examined among youth 10-15 year olds surveyed nationally in the United States. At Wave 1 in 2006, participants (n = 1,588) were queried about these exposures and outcomes in the preceding 12 months. Wave 2 data (n = 1,206) were collected approximately 12 months after Wave 1 and Wave 3 data (n = 1,159) were collected approximately 24 months after Wave 1. Thus, data for this project represent a 36-month time frame. A marginal model with generalized estimating equations was used to represent the population-average odds of sexually aggressive behavior over the 36 months as a function of exposure to x-rated material over the same time and to account for clustering in the data within person over time. An average of 5% of youth reported perpetrating sexually aggressive behavior and 23% of youth reported intentional exposure to x-rated material. After adjusting for other potentially influential proximal (i.e., sexual aggression victimization) and distal characteristics (e.g., substance use), we found that intentional exposure to violent x-rated material over time predicted an almost 6-fold increase in the odds of self-reported sexually aggressive behavior (aOR: 5.8, 95% CI: 3.2, 10.5), whereas exposure to nonviolent x-rated material was not statistically significantly related (aOR: 1.7, 95% CI: 0.94, 2.9). Associations were similar for boys and girls (boys nonviolent x-rated material aOR = 2.0, 95% CI: 0.8, 4.7; violent x-rated material aOR = 6.5, 95% CI: 2.7, 15.3; girls nonviolent x-rated material aOR = 1.2, 95% CI: 0.5, 3.2; viole[n]t x-rated material aOR = 6.1, 95% CI: 2.5, 14.8)."
"X-rated material and perpetration of sexually aggressive behavior among children and adolescents: is there a link?" Aggressive Behavior. 2011 Jan-Feb; 37(1): 1-18. PMID 21046607. doi:10.1002/ab.20367.
No.10730 KONTRA
> It is long past time
Yes, it's too late. And now society will forever descent into a feedback loop of decay.
You've lost, anorectal prophet. It's over. Admit it and surrender.
No.11163
"Dating violence (DV) and sexual violence (SV) are widespread problems among adolescents and emerging adults. A growing body of literature demonstrates that exposure to sexually explicit media (SEM) and sexually violent media (SVM) may be risk factors for DV and SV. The purpose of this article is to provide a systematic and comprehensive literature review on the impact of exposure to SEM and SVM on DV and SV attitudes and behaviors. A total of 43 studies utilizing adolescent and emerging adult samples were reviewed, and collectively the findings suggest that (1) exposure to SEM and SVM is positively related to DV and SV myths and more accepting attitudes toward DV and SV; (2) exposure to SEM and SVM is positively related to actual and anticipated DV and SV victimization, perpetration, and bystander nonintervention; (3) SEM and SVM more strongly impact men's DV and SV attitudes and behaviors than women's DV and SV attitudes and behaviors; and (4) preexisting attitudes related to DV and SV and media preferences moderate the relationship between SEM and SVM exposure and DV and SV attitudes and behaviors. Future studies should strive to employ longitudinal and experimental designs, more closely examine the mediators and moderators of SEM and SVM exposure on DV and SV outcomes, focus on the impacts of SEM and SVM that extend beyond men's use of violence against women, and examine the extent to which media literacy programs could be used independently or in conjunction with existing DV and SV prevention programs to enhance effectiveness of these programming efforts."
"The Impacts of Sexual Media Exposure on Adolescent and Emerging Adults' Dating and Sexual Violence Attitudes and Behaviors: A Critical Review of the Literature." Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2019 Oct; 20(4): 439-452. PMID 29333966. doi:10.1177/1524838017717745. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
No.11778
"Overall, this meta-analysis demonstrates consistent and robust relations between media exposure and sexual attitudes and behavior spanning multiple outcome measures and multiple media. Media portray sexual behavior as highly prevalent, recreational, and relatively risk-free [3], and our analyses suggest that a viewer’s own sexual decision-making may be shaped, in part, by viewing these types of portrayals. Our findings are in direct contrast with the previous meta-analysis, which suggested that media’s impact on sexual behavior was trivial or nonexistent [4]. The previous meta-analysis used 38 effect sizes and found that “sexy” media were weakly and trivially related with sexual behavior (r = .08), whereas the current meta-analysis used more than 10 times the amount of effect sizes (n = 394) and found an effect nearly double the size (r = .14)."
"First, we found positive associations between exposure to sexual media and teens’ and young adults’ permissive sexual attitudes and perceptions of their peers’ sexual experiences. Second, exposure to sexual media content was associated with greater acceptance of common rape myths. Finally, sexual media exposure was found to predict sexual behaviors including age of sexual initiation, overall sexual experience, and risky sexual behavior. These results converged across multiple methodologies and provide support for the assertion that media contribute to the sexual experiences of young viewers."
"Although the meta-analysis demonstrated significant effects of sexual media exposure on sexual attitudes and behaviors across all variables of interest, these effects were moderated by a few variables. Most notably, significant effects for all ages were apparent; however, the effect was more than twice as large for adolescents as for emerging adults, perhaps reflecting the fact that older participants likely have more comparative, real-world experience to draw on than younger participants [36,37]. In addition, the effect was stronger for males compared with females, perhaps because sexual experimentation fits the male sexual script [18] and because male characters are punished less often than female characters for sexual initiation [38]. Finally, the effect was stronger for white participants compared with black participants. This finding aligns with expectations of social cognitive theory [6], which anticipates that black youth may identify less strongly with the predominantly white characters of mainstream media."
... "These findings have significant implications for adolescent and emerging adult physical and mental health. Perceiving high levels of peer sexual activity and sexual permissiveness may increase feelings of internal pressure to experiment sexually [39]. In one study, exposure to sexual media content in early adolescence was seen to advance sexual initiation by 9—17 months [40]; in turn, early experimentation may increase mental and physical health risks [37]."
"Contributions of Mainstream Sexual Media Exposure to Sexual Attitudes, Perceived Peer Norms, and Sexual Behavior: A Meta-Analysis." Journal of Adolescent Health. 2019 Apr; 64(4): 430-436. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.11.016. (PMID 30691937) Epub 2019 Jan 26.
No.11806
What is your opinion regarding shaving
hair around anus? On the one hand, it's more hygienic and aesthetic. Easier to clean. On the other hand, it causes skin irritation and ingrown hairs.
Also it somehow changes acoustic, so farting becomes louder and more ringing. It's harder to hide it, which leads to breaking social norms and societal decay.
To shave or not to shave?
No.11936
"In this article, we explore the gendered dynamics of coercion described by 18 women we interviewed about their experiences of unwanted and nonconsensual heterosexual anal sex. Several women referred to what they believed to be the normative status of heterosexual anal sex. In many cases, the socially coercive effects of perceived norms intertwined with threads of interpersonal coercion, leaving women feeling pressured to agree to, or little room to refuse, anal sex they did not want. We discuss the ways that new sexual norms can translate into new pressures for women within the gendered framework of heterosexual relationships."
"'You Feel Like Normal Sex is not Enough Anymore': Women's Experiences of Coercive and Unwanted Anal Sex with Men." Violence Against Women. 2022 Sep; 28(11): 2624-2648. PMID 34913380. doi:10.1177/10778012211045716. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
No.12141
"Objectives: This study explores how young women learn about anal sex and the sources of information they use, with a particular focus on information received from health care providers.
Methods: In-depth interviews were conducted with 29 young women aged 18–24 who reported any lifetime experience of anal intercourse. Interviews lasted up to 90 min and were audio-recorded, transcribed, verified and coded in ATLAS.ti. Themes related to sources of information, sex education, and perceptions and conversations with health care providers about anal sex were explored.
Results: Young women described a dearth of information about anal sex gained via formal avenues, such as school education or health care providers, and relied more on information accessed through informal channels. These information sources included those gained passively from friends, partners, pornography or erotica, or information they accessed through the internet (e.g., health-related websites and web-video channels). Very few women reported ever having spoken with a health care provider about it; most said it had not come up, and had perceptions that clinicians were not interested in or comfortable with discussing matters related to sex beyond pregnancy risk.
Conclusions: Anal sex is a common sexual practice among heterosexual women but remains a taboo topic for discussion or education even in arenas where such discussion belongs. This leaves many young women unaware of the risks associated with anal sex and of how to protect themselves. Both educational and health care settings should offer young women reliable information about anal sex."
"“Never anything about anal sex whatsoever”: young women’s reflections on sources of information about anal sex." Contraception. 2017 Oct; 96(4): 303. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2017.07.151.
No.12144 KONTRA
>>11806Now, when the dust has settled, I'm convinced that shaving was a right decision
No.12270
>>9287The new edition of the references compilation probably will be finished soon. Here's a WIP version of T&A along with the list of changes so far:
- [T&A] Dropped 10.1071/SH14225 & PMID 30461344 & 10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.024 & PMID 25466233 & 10.1002/car.1092 &
https://www.medicinenet.com/sexual_masochism/definition.htm- [T&A] Added 10.1177/1059840514563313 & PMC4810035 & 10.1177/2374623816668275 & PMC8474329 & reintroduced 10.1111/jcom.12201 & 10.1002/ejp.662 &
https://greymattersjournal.org/masochism/- [AR1] Added 10.1007/s10350-004-6252-7 & 10.1016/j.mcna.2007.12.004
- [AR2] Dropped PMC4541538 & PMID 21805112 & PMC214027 & PMC5364439
- [AR2] Added 10.1007/s003840100325 & 10.1086/380838 & PMC7035412 & 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01306-9 & PMC7392573
- [AR3] Dropped PMC2780055
- [AR3] Added PMC5728226 & Rectal Cancer: New Frontiers in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Rehabilitation (2005) - Page 109
- [P&I] Added 10.1007/s10620-020-06394-0 & 10.1007/s00384-019-03439-3
No.12328 KONTRA
Anal sex destroy the root-chakra. I read it on twitter.
No.12330
>>12328David Icke says elites rape children in butt, because this way they can absorb energy from childrens' root chakra
>>12270Why do you ignore my posts about shaving?
No.12336
>>12270The new 2024/01/11 edition is now available:
https://pst.moe/paste/pyokco or
https://paste2.org/pjAjsgB7AR2 and P&I now support (via 10.1007/s003840100325 and 10.1007/s00384-019-03439-3) the assertion that at least internal anal sphincter (IAS) damage has been reported as a result of insertion of a 40mm / 4cm / 1.57 inch rectoscope during transanal endoscopic microsurgery. A study added to AR1, 10.1007/s10350-004-6252-7, suggests that the duration of the procedure may be a factor as well. In the future the summary supported by Prolapse & Incontinence may include an assertion that anoreceptive insertions 4cm wide and greater can result in permanent damage at least to the IAS. 4cm width probably is much less than some might expect (and that some have claimed) could cause such damage.
>>10480> I wrote in the previous thread that I would ignore this apparently-German person, or someone very similar. This is my last intentional response to him or her.>>10350> People are welcome to start paying attention and begin actually listening any time.Those who ignore the text covering logically-fallacious diversionary tactics (included in the OP image and pasted in 10350) will be ignored in turn. That includes introducing red herrings and misrepresentations.
No.12689
"With much of the literature focusing on young people’s exposure to and use of pornography, there have been increasing concerns about the consequences that pornography might have on young people's psychosocial health. There are a number of ways that pornography could affect a young person’s psychological wellbeing. The predominance of body enhancements may negatively affect adolescent’s perceptions about their bodies, appearance, and/or sexual performance. Further, the pervasiveness of harmful gender stereotypes and men’s violence against women [11] could lead to relationship dysfunction and increase the risk of intimate partner violence, and thus impact mental health. Finally, researchers have observed how the rise in new technologies create favorable conditions for addictive behaviors such as compulsive pornography use [12], which could contribute to lower life satisfaction and self-esteem, and lead to higher social isolation. That said, the direction of the relationship between poor mental health and pornography watching is unclear. Theoretically, poor mental health could affect a person’s pornography use where pornography is used as a way to "cope" with depression and mental health problems [6]. The frequency of pornography use, the age of consumption, and the sex of the viewer are all variables that could influence the relationship between pornography psychosocial health [13]."
"Most studies focusing on young people and pornography have looked at the relationship between pornography consumption and sexual attitudes and behaviors, in particular sexual risky behavior [14] and sexual aggression [1]. Fewer studies have specifically focused on the association between young people’s pornography consumption and psychosocial health. Among existing studies, researchers have found associations between pornography consumption and less social interaction and bonding [15], lower self-esteem [16, 17] and more often symptoms of depression [18, 19]. Mattebo et al. [20] found that boys who frequently (daily) watched pornography (10%) spent significantly more time at the computer (more than 10 h straight several times a week) and reported more problems with relationships with peers, truancy, obesity and use of both alcohol and tobacco. On the other hand, their self-reported health, apart from being overweight, was no worse than those who did not watch pornography frequently. In a later study, pornography use among girls was associated with similar outcomes, such as more sexual experiences, peer problems, alcohol, and tobacco use [21]. A longitudinal school-based study conducted by the same research group showed that psychosomatic symptoms at the age of 18 were predicted by high pornography consumption at the age of 16 in combination with being a girl, living with separated parents and attending a vocational high school program [22]. On the contrary, depressive symptoms at age 18 were predicted by less pornography use at age 16 and being a girl. A cross-sectional study in six European countries concluded that exposure to pornography is ubiquitous, more relevant to boys, and is associated with both positive/competences and externalizing behavior problems [23]. In Svedin and colleagues' survey from 2004 [24] boys who consumed pornography "more or less daily” consumed alcohol more often than other male adolescents—a behavior shown to be associated with psychological distress, such as anxiety and depressive symptoms [25]."
No.12690
(continued from the previous post)
... "having watched deviant pornography, defined as pornography showing violence, children and/or animals, was significantly associated with poor mental health in five out of six bivariate analyses but only in three of the multivariate analyses (boys in two and girls in one of the surveys). This finding partly supports the notion that the actual content in the pornography watched has implications when it comes to poor psychosocial health, a finding in line with a study among Italian adolescents [51]. Whether exposure to deviant pornography contributes to poor mental health, whether poor mental health is a predictor for watching deviant pornography, or some combination of the two, remains unclear."
"Associations between adolescents watching pornography and poor mental health in three Swedish surveys." European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2023 Sep; 32(9): 1765-1780. PMC10460300. doi:10.1007/s00787-022-01992-x. Epub 2022 May 7.
No.12710
>>12708Stunning and brave
No.12720
>>12708He didn't make it to the knot.
There was at least 5 centimeters remaining.
Disgraceful.
If you're going to flex (or on the contrary, loosen up hehe), at least editorialize so that you only display your successes.
No.12797
What does OP think about buttplugs? Are they dangerous too?
>>12756 > Anal sex is Jewish sexInteresting claim, I found the source of it:
https://www.haaretz.com/2004-12-31/ty-article/u-k-conference-discusses-sex-ed-israeli-rock/0000017f-e162-d568-ad7f-f36b6c950000Damn, I hate how verbose "serious newspapers" are. It's hyperinformation epoch, people are saturated with information, you should keep it short and digestible as much as possible.
>>12720Your post smells with envy.
No.12870
>>12336> In the future the summary supported by Prolapse & Incontinence may include an assertion that anoreceptive insertions 4cm wide and greater can result in permanent damage at least to the IAS.That summary was revised recently. Here's the updated version:
• Strong frictional sliding (aka shear) in the anal canal is likely to permanently damage supporting tissues of the internal hemorrhoidal cushions at the least, leading to internal hemorrhoidal prolapse (progressively worsening with cumulative damage). Injury to one or more of the internal hemorrhoidal cushions elicits no pain sensation due to an absence of somatic innervation. Because healthy internal and external anal cushions help to maintain fecal continence with a watertight seal, anal canal deformation due to their disease or removal can result in fecal incontinence (FI). Furthermore, pulling or traction on nerves in the anorectal region can lead to neuropathy and associated FI.
• Internal rectal prolapse (IRP), aka rectal intussusception, is a common finding among asymptomatic individuals. Strong, repeated frictional sliding in the rectum probably does contribute to development of full-thickness external rectal prolapse (aka procidentia) particularly when IRP is present. Internal hemorrhoidal prolapse—among other conditions—also may contribute to rectal prolapse development. FI can be a consequence of rectal prolapse as well.
• Stretching the anal canal with girthy insertions is likely to disrupt or fragment one or both anal sphincter muscles, possibly without pain as the internal anal sphincter muscle also lacks somatic innervation. Such damage, which has been reported after insertions merely 4 cm wide, results in permanent muscle weakening and is associated with FI especially with a damaged or dysfunctional puborectalis muscle. Stretching the anal canal repeatedly with insertions of progressively increasing circumference may cause cumulative muscle injury.
• Trauma—including anoreceptive trauma—can instigate development of numerous other anorectal conditions that may lead to FI, such as a fistula. Additionally, surgical treatment for anorectal conditions can contribute to development of FI.
No.13221
"Women are often depicted as sex objects rather than as human beings in the media (e.g., magazines, television programs, films, and video games). Theoretically, media depictions of females as sex objects could lead to negative attitudes and even aggressive behavior toward them in the real world. Using the General Aggression Model (Anderson & Bushman, 2002) as a theoretical framework, this meta-analytic review synthesizes the literature on the effects of sexualized media (both violent and nonviolent) on aggression-related thoughts, attitudes, and behaviors. Our sample includes 166 independent studies involving 124,236 participants, which yielded 321 independent effects. Overall, the effects were "small" to "moderate" in size (r = .16 [.14-.18]). Significant correlations were found in experimental, cross-sectional, and longitudinal studies, indicating a triangulation of evidence. Effects were stronger for violent sexualized media (r = .25 [.19-.31]) than for nonviolent sexualized media (r = .15 [.13-.17]), although the effects of nonviolent sexualized media were still significant and nontrivial in size. Moreover, the effects of violent sexualized media on aggression were greater than the effects of violent non-sexualized media on aggression obtained in previous meta-analyses. Effects were similar for male and female participants, for college students and non-students, and for participants of all ages. The effects were also stable over time. Sensitivity analyses found that effects were not unduly influenced by publication bias and/or outliers. In summary, exposure to sexualized media content, especially in combination with violence, has negative effects on women, particularly on what people think about them and how aggressively they treat them."
"Effects of violent and nonviolent sexualized media on aggression-related thoughts, feelings, attitudes, and behaviors: A meta-analytic review." Aggressive Behavior. 2022 Jan; 48(1): 111-136. PMID 34632594. doi:10.1002/ab.21998. Epub 2021 Oct 10.
No.14514
>>10435Here is an updated edition of rbocommentary as plaintext:
https://web.archive.org/web/20240315032556/https://pst.moe/paste/uolcuoThis entire endeavor appears to be pointless when it seems no one is actually taking action... Perhaps that won't always be true, though.
>>10442> I suspect that those issues can't be metaphorically swept under the rug forever, though. Societies worldwide, particularly people within government and educational institutions, may well be forced into action at some point — perhaps once the consequences of inaction become impossible to ignore, and probably both much too late and constituting far too little for some (Me? Nah... I don't matter, remember? Sigh). No.14611
>>14610> may nor may not*may or may not
No.14615
>>14610Thank you for your service.
No.14650
>>14610Mhhahaahaha, anorectal violence have won! Now societal decandence will continue forever!!!
Seriously speaking, anorectal violence stems from the problem of sexual inequality. Incels who don't have access to sex, develop porn addiction which gets worse with time, while chads have so much sex, that they get bored of it and seek perversions.
If everyone had a fair share of sex, anal wouldn't be a thing.
#incelVisibilityMonth
No.14685
>>14650People like you make me want to continue.
> Mhhahaahaha, anorectal violence have won! Now societal decandence will continue forever!!!As I noted previously: I suspect that those issues can't be metaphorically swept under the rug forever[...]. Societies worldwide, particularly people within government and educational institutions, may well be forced into action at some point — perhaps once the consequences of inaction become impossible to ignore, and probably both much too late and constituting far too little for some[...].
> anorectal violence stems from the problem of sexual inequality.1. As I noted in the original post's image: The burden of proof rests on the claimant.
2. As I also noted in the original post (text and image), the causation (etiology) of rampant anorectal violence is multifactorial. Sexual inequality may be a contributing factor, but that remains to be demonstrated with evidence. Certainly it's not the only contributing factor.
> If everyone had a fair share of sex, anal wouldn't be a thing.That is highly unlikely.
Anyway, concerning the burden of proof: I've referenced material documenting plenty of misinformation/disinformation about anorectal topics (c.f. rbocommentary) along with examples of people with (self-)destructive tendencies having a field day with anorectal violence (c.f. /r/painal and /r/roughanal: pathological sexual sadism and masochism most certainly are involved when viewers and/or participants are deriving pleasure from pain and injury). As for prevalent (willful) ignorance and apathy about anorectal subjects, those could be demonstrated more prominently. Two studies included in the most recent references compilations (2022/01 & 2024/01) mention stigma surrounding such matters: 10.3109/13814788.2014.899578 and 10.1007/s00192-016-3195-1. It should be clear from the Australian news articles along with the BMJ Open study that ignorance especially of the traumatic risks of anoreceptive activities is a major problem.
No.14686
>>9269> What arguably should easily be considered incriminating behavior worldwide is commonly featured in public pornography, in many cases being sold for profit and far too often serving as an example to be copied.One reason why I don't want to continue is that I'm very strongly tempted to take on the roles of judge and jury to lay the groundwork for one or more people to take on the final role of executioner (whether or not that will ever include myself).
I have a very strong desire to start writing things like this: Steve Huffman, CEO of Reddit, is facilitating widespread criminal violence along with factors contributing to it with his failure for many years to enforce his own site's policies on subreddits such as /r/painal, /r/roughanal, and /r/sex. He is one person who should be held accountable by any means necessary. The same could be said for people involved with those mentioned subreddits, among others. And, now that Reddit is a public company, now or in the future there could be a profit aspect involved as well: Reddit employees may well be profiting from violent crime so as long as those subreddits featuring such crime remain. They also may be profiting from factors facilitating those crimes so long as people on subreddits such as /r/sex are allowed to spread health-harmful falsehoods in violation of Reddit's official policy (one problem here is that /r/sex's official "sex-positive" policy gives moderators an excuse to censor factual information as being "sex-negative," setting aside the point that "anal sex" is a misnomer...).
No.14687
>>14685> prevalent (willful) ignorance and apathy about anorectal subjectsThese articles were included in past editions of Trends & Associations:
"'It really is shocking how many myths young people have about anal sex,' said Judy Kuriansky, a Columbia University professor and author of 'Sexuality Education: Past Present and Future.'"
... "[Megan Carpentier, who writes about politics and women for Jezebel.com] said the dismantling of comprehensive sex education programs in the public schools is to blame for teen ignorance about the hazards of anal sex. And it is unrealistic to expect doctors to talk to teens about this touchy topic."
... "Anal sex statistics indicate that a generational change has occurred, where people born in the 1980s and later may be more comfortable admitting to or showing interest in anal sex. [Sexuality educator Cory] Silverberg attributes interest in the behavior among heterosexuals, in part, to the proliferation of pornography in the 1990s."
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/study-reports-anal-sex-on-rise-among-teens/story?id=6428003 (2008/12)
"Women are also under pressure to emulate the porn stars' apparent penchant for anal sex, according to four consecutive Swedish studies, the latest published in 2005 in the International Journal of STD and AIDS. Young men who are regular porn consumers are more likely to have had anal sex with a girl, and most of the men liked it. Most young women did not like anal sex, with fewer than half saying they would do it again, the studies found."
https://www.smh.com.au/news/technology/how-porn-is-wrecking-relationships/2007/05/25/1179601669144.html?page=fullpage No.14994
>>14610> I'm officially shelving this endeavor on which I wasted more than 16 years of my life> I did shelve this "crusade" once before, and obviously it was unshelved. That may [or] may not happen again.It's happening again. However, I'm changing my tactics: I intend to be much "spammier" and far less interactive at least on other sites. I wasted far too much time in the past defending myself. That needs to end.
>>9269> These topics, plus the voluminous amount of information from others, are far more important than anything about a lone person trying to raise awareness of them.Oh, and speaking of a hostile site/board administration...
https://web.archive.org/web/20231207091026/https://crystal.cafe/b/res/258731.html [Thread deleted, as expected]
> [Thread topic] Save the turdcutters!> Perhaps I am a crazy man. It really doesn't matter. These issues truly are important to humanity in general, as many people likely will realize one day the hard way (i.e., through first-hand experience). They're gonna bite people in the butt, pardon the pun.> At least try to fix those damn English Wikipedia articles already, girls. Please. You should be happy that some idiot out there cares enough about these matters to "crusade" over them for more than 15 years. Of course, an aesthetic anus fetish kinda forces him to care, but ah well. Details, eh?> I ought to just stop. I'm a NEET incel who's only growing older. I should hate you girls, but I can't bring myself to contravene my conscience (which I developed almost 20 years ago due to a catalyst I won't explain; prior to that I was a decidedly non-sadistic psychopath). My bark certainly is worse than my bite: I sometimes post vile shit (pun intended), but it's unlikely I'll ever deliver on returning violence with violence. No.14996
I think, we might compare anorectal violence to C++: dangerous, brutal, cruel.
And vaginal lovemaking to Rust: nice, clean, safe, natural.
#safeProgrammingMonth
No.14997
>>14994>Of course, an aesthetic anus fetish kinda forces him to care, but ah wellWait, wait, wait.
This whole thing was derived from anal fetishism? I'm gonna be sick...
No.15034
>>9269> These topics, plus the voluminous amount of information from others, are far more important than anything about a lone person trying to raise awareness of them.Many people will have to get that through their heads at some point.
>>14997> anal fetishismThat term is rather vague and encompasses a variety of erotic attractions, although most commonly it refers to an attraction to anal insertions. That is why I wrote specifically about an aesthetic anus fetish in the OP image in an attempt to be clear and unambiguous. Here's yet another relevant old post from elsewhere:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220527153217/https://crystal.cafe/nsfw/res/6633.html#6866 Thread topic: "do men care about how your butt hole looks??"
Anonymous 01/17/22 (Mon) 04:40:34 AM 6866
> [Referencing post 6638] most guys probably won'tThat is probably correct, unless it very obviously has one or more very noticeable abnormalities. Even then many guys might not care, especially if they just see it as an unimportant "fuckhole" that can be abused without consequences (to them, anyway).
> [Referencing post 6638] but if he has an anal fetish, then it might be important.I disagree: An "anal fetish" and an aesthetic anus fetish are separate attractions. The former typically refers to an attraction to / interest in anal insertions, and seems to be quite common thanks in part to pornography and societal decadence (including proliferation of [willful] ignorance about anorectal anatomy and health, violent anorectal abuse, and more). The latter seems to be very rare indeed. As I wrote in the image:
> [Quoting what I wrote in TAKE ACTION v7 as well as TAv6 included in this thread's original post] A human anus resembling the anatomical ideal at rest has symmetrical features; symmetry is one aspect that humans consider when evaluating beauty. Partly due to common prejudices against and denigration of the anus along with rampant, anus-mutilating erotic anorectal violence, developing an aesthetic anus fetish is highly unusual; and _accepting_ it, even moreso. This fetish does indeed seem to be very rare: otherwise that violence would have strong opposition. Some malicious people (such as sexual sadists and sadistic psychopaths) pretend to have such a fetish—and will even praise a clearly damaged/diseased anus typically without being challenged—because doing so facilitates and perpetuates anorectal violence. No.15035
>>15034You're a sick man, not driven by the desire to save humanity from anorectal complications, but wholly driven by your own fetishism.
>"Noo! It's not an anal fetish, it's an aesthetic anus fetish!"The hypocrisy is the worst part.
No.15048
>>15035Shut up. Yours are weirder. Seriously though: You're only proving my points about people not listening (possibly due to a nefarious agenda; at this point I'm quite used to people trying to smear me, twisting my words and meaning, etc.) and about wasting far too much of my time defending myself.
Anyway, there is no hypocrisy here; it should be abundantly clear that I am opposing anorectal violence in particular, not fetishism in general. Quoting 4chan /gif/thread/9447250 Thu 20 Oct 2016 03:16:57 No.9470219
https://archived.moe/gif/thread/9447250/#9470219> Someone who likes the anus aesthetically (particularly those resembling the anatomical ideal) is an anus fetishist. Such people jerk off while staring at an aesthetically-pleasing male or female anus (depending on sexual orientation).> Someone who likes to [watch others] stick things into a male or female anus, on the other hand, is unlikely to be an anus fetishist. Anal sex blocks the view of the anus at best, and typically it and other vigorous anal insertions result in visible, unhealthy, and undesirable changes to a receptive person's anus. It would not take an actual anus fetishist very long to notice this nowadays.> There does not seem to be a great number of people out there who actually have an aesthetic anus fetish. If there were, then a significant portion of them would--at the very least--be loudly complaining about the rampant, anus-mutilating anal abuse in porn industries worldwide.>>9269> These topics, plus the voluminous amount of information from others, are far more important than anything about a lone person trying to raise awareness of them.>>10350> People are welcome to start paying attention and begin actually listening any time.>>14994> I wasted far too much time in the past defending myself. That needs to end. No.15127
>>14994> I'm changing my tactics: I intend to be much "spammier" and far less interactive at least on other sites.I'll probably begin posting new threads on various sites soon. However, first I'm thinking about changing the wording of the "decadence" paste included in the OP image:
>>9269> Since the vast majority of humanity likely never will care much at least about another person's anus, discouraging anoreceptive activities entirely is the only realistic solution.Feedback is welcome on the potential new wording of the first part: Since the vast majority of humanity does not wish to think seriously about anorectal topics due e.g. to stigma, ...
>>14685> Two studies included in the most recent references compilations (2022/01 & 2024/01) mention stigma surrounding such matters: 10.3109/13814788.2014.899578 and 10.1007/s00192-016-3195-1.The part about discouraging anoreceptive activities entirely being the only realistic solution is remaining the same. As I quoted on the damon4 (4 Nomad) web page back in 2008:
"Condoms provide some protection, but anal intercou[r]se is simply too dangerous to practice."
-- C. Everett Koop, U.S. Surgeon General 1982-1989
https://web.archive.org/web/20080104154957/http://www.fda.gov/oashi/aids/condom.html No.15129
It is of utmost importance that we address these matters seriously and effectively.
No.15130
>>15127>Feedback is welcome on the potential new wording of the first part: Since the vast majority of humanity does not wish to think seriously about anorectal topics due e.g. to stigma, ...How about:
Since the vast majority of humanity are not compelled by their fetishistic anal obsession to spam imageboards...
No.15132 KONTRA
this guy eats ass
No.15488
While the idea of anilingus might be appealing, the reality could be less so — especially if a licker contracts one or more diseases (due to ingestion of fecal bacteria for example).
No.15771
Bump
No.15832
'In a recent episode of Radio 4 Woman's Hour series, a woman spoke about how much damage pornography had on her relationship. One woman on the show said that her husband encouraged her to shave her pubic hair and try anal sex after he had watched it happen in a pornographic film, according to the Daily Mail.'
'The new show has been marketed as "an honest and frank conversation about porn and how it affects people." Reporter Ena Miller speaks with different people about how explicit adult films have impacted people's relationships.'
'In the most recent episode, one anonymous woman who simply went by "Joanna" said that she had become so upset by her husband's porn addiction that she encouraged him to sleep with someone else instead of watching the explicit material. The woman she said first became aware that her addicted husband was watching porn alone after she typed a kiss into his phone while replying to a message.'
'The "X" button on his phone reportedly pulled up a porn site, and a subsequent search found that he had been watching pornography several times a week without his wife knowing about it.'
'When she confronted him about it, he tried to justify the behavior by saying that "everybody does it," and that "it was just fantasy and those women aren't real." Joanna went on to say that "you couldn't take the porn out of the sex life we had," adding that it was "so inextricably linked because porn had been part of all of his adult life — longer and more than sex had."'
... 'According to FHE Health, 70% of men visit a pornography website every month. And about 90% of children between 8 and 16 years of age have viewed porn at least once in their life. The report also mentioned that about 25% of all search engine requests are for porn sites.'
https://www.theblaze.com/news/he-became-desensitized-to-violent-acts-woman-shares-what-her-porn-addicted-husband-requested-of-her-in-the-bedroom'He became desensitized to violent acts': Woman shares what her porn-addicted husband requested of her in the bedroom (2024/03/02)
No.15839
>>15832How many thousands of hours of pornography do you think you have under your belt, anal fetishist?
No.15893
Quoting yet more old posts of mine from elsewhere (each from a different place):
> I've encountered some people out there who seem to have a nefarious agenda (perhaps even operating out of a playbook using tactics and fallacies I pointed out previously, among others), or who at least seem very intent on wasting my time by having me go in circles pointing out the same things over and over again.> I'm thinking a catalyst will be needed before many people seriously and effectively address the major matters to which I've been trying to draw attention for far too many years. That catalyst most likely will be one or more people taking justice into their own hands, i.e. bloodshed.>>9269> Generations of people have been, and continue to be, inspired by pervasive violence: namely anorectal violence. Many perpetrators of this violence against one or more others especially in public pornography have not faced severe punishment despite both 1) the high likelihood of anorectal injury to a receptive person due to anorectal fragility, and 2) the significance and potential severity (even lethality) of resultant traumatic consequences. What arguably should easily be considered incriminating behavior worldwide is commonly featured in public pornography, in many cases being sold for profit and far too often serving as an example to be copied. This situation is both one of the greatest injustices and one of the greatest contributors to societal decadence in the modern era. Facilitating factors include prevalent (willful) ignorance, apathy, and misinformation about anorectal topics, which are enabling people with (self-)destructive tendencies to have a field day with anorectal violence and to spread disinformation quite effectively.Considering that decades have passed in many cases, factors such as statutes of limitations and relocation may render _severe_ criminal prosecution of such violent criminals by governments impossible. In such cases is there any alternative means for justice to be served without one more people taking justice into their own hands? Is the International Criminal Court (ICC) for example capable of putting such violent criminals away for a long time, providing both justice and sorely-needed examples of severe consequences for violent crime to dissuade far too many others from engaging in similar criminal acts? If not, could the ICC realistically be given that capability?
No.16280
For how many more years will issues covered in the OP image (not to mention additional issues documented in this thread) remain unaddressed?
No.16281 KONTRA
>>16280For as long as not everyone has aesthetic anus fetishes.
No.16393
https://web.archive.org/web/20221119190619/https://archived.moe/gif/thread/10280540/#10328769> Anonymous Wed 29 Mar 2017 05:00:17 No.10328769> As I've pointed out countless times before, this isn't about me. It's about you, and many other people. Why don't many people react the same way for anal abuse as they do for other (typically less dangerous) abuse? (Furthermore, why doesn't anyone even TRY to seriously improve Wikipedia's articles about anal sex and the human anus, which have been terrible for years? I've been posting plenty of good sources that should be cited by those articles, also for years*, and yet no one is doing anything significant with them so far as I can tell.)> Porn industries worldwide have normalized blatantly criminal behavior. Anal sex and insertions with a girthy penis/object combined with rapid thrusting and a prolonged duration are the norm in porn, even for "first" anal sex scenes. Taking that into consideration along with the fragility of the anorectal area, it is simply not possible for anal and rectal injuries (and serious/chronic/permanent consequences) to be uncommon.Maybe updating all of my pastes to take on the roles of judge and jury, as I did in the post quoted above, will be more effective... That's at least something that has not yet been tried. Perhaps, in this day and age, upping the ante is the only way to get through to people about these matters.
>>14686> One reason why I don't want to continue is that I'm very strongly tempted to take on the roles of judge and jury to lay the groundwork for one or more people to take on the final role of executioner (whether or not that will ever include myself). No.16394
Here's another quote-worthy old post of mine:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220220222436/https://archived.moe/gif/thread/13120417/#13147702> Anonymous Tue 17 Jul 2018 21:51:55 No.13147702> As one of the few people out there who actually has an aesthetic anus fetish, I fap exclusively to no-anal pornstars who had an anus that remained consistently pretty throughout a porn stint -- and preferably are retired so I don't have to worry about being disappointed (as I was too many times in the past). That's because I don't want what I like to be ruined. That is the exact same expectation as, e.g., a person who likes natural breasts and doesn't want them to be 'ruined' with a boob job. The difference here, of course, is that a ruined anus usually is rather more significant than a boob job for example -- and a boob job is considered a sane and desirable enhancement for some people.> I've been forced into nofap due to how difficult it is to satisfy my strongest fetish with new material. That's another indication that my strongest fetish is *very* rare. That's why I say this is a thread full of trolls pretending to have a fetish they don't actually have. I don't see anyone other than myself crusading over the rampant, blatantly anus-mutilating, criminal anorectal abuse that porn industries worldwide have managed to normalize and that has somehow become commonly acceptable and tolerated (along with unhealthy results). There's ample evidence of that on 4chan's porn boards alone.> Many people need to fight back against those with severely destructive mental disorders who are having a field day especially with anorectal abuse and spreading misinformation. The repercussions of inaction are very obviously detrimental to societies worldwide. No.16397
>>9269From the Wikipedia critique in the OP image:
> The "anal sex" article [...] lacks neutrality; it gives the impression that opposition is limited to irrational religious positions by omitting any _scientific_ opposing perspective, e.g.: The human anorectum is very unsuited for many common receptive activities due to the region's anatomy and physiology. The single short-term benefit, _potential_ pleasure, is greatly outweighed by the many short- and long-term health risks to a receptive person.>>15926> https://archive.is/202211/http://phichannlejbh7u7tvkryemqmi34onsfppkju52qtii3yakyvfh7ifyd.onion/b/thread/1113From that thread:
> As I pointed out elsewhere nearly five years ago (which relates to what I wrote in the OP about unrestrained hedonism):> A lesson that many people need to learn is that pleasure should not override sense. The fact that an activity is potentially pleasurable doesn't mean it's a good idea.Later in the thread, responding to someone who claimed "Women love anal:"
> Not all of them do, perhaps not even a majority. From the News.com.au article currently included in Trends & Associations: "[Dr Meagan Tyler, a research fellow at RMIT University] said research shows women are suffering from faecal incontinence as a result of anal sex and that they’re “uncomfortable” with the assumption that it’s become “the norm”. “That’s the brutal material reality for what it means for these young women’s lives.”"> Furthermore, there can be a variety of factors involved. Coercion is an all-too-common one especially in the context of anal intercourse. Another one, possibly common as well, is sexual masochism disorder: a person deriving pleasure from their own pain/injury. As noted by a study (PMID 27600835) currently included in Trends & Associations: "Sexual masochism disorder is considered the most prevalent paraphilia among women." Another factor could be desiring to please a partner, even to such a degree that a woman may lie or exaggerate about her own experience(s) — in other words, telling one or more partners what they might want to hear.Additional factors especially in for-profit pornography include the desire to make money, please viewers, sell a narrative, etc.
No.16402 KONTRA
>>16396the vid is just about the upload limit size.
(her massive orgasm starts at around ~3:35)
No.16411
>>16402>>16396Wow, what a passion. Very hot video
No.16446
>>9269> Generations of people have been, and continue to be, inspired by pervasive violence: namely anorectal violence. Many perpetrators of this violence against one or more others especially in public pornography have not faced severe punishment despite both 1) the high likelihood of anorectal injury to a receptive person due to anorectal fragility, and 2) the significance and potential severity (even lethality) of resultant traumatic consequences. What arguably should easily be considered incriminating behavior worldwide is commonly featured in public pornography, in many cases being sold for profit and far too often serving as an example to be copied.Anorectal violence is defined in the OP image's top paste: anoreceptive activity involving a combination of rapid thrusting, considerable girth, and a prolonged duration. There are, or arguably most certainly should be, criminal implications for people who perpetrate anorectal violence against one or more others due to the possibility of serious injury and even potential for subsequent fatality. Furthermore, various additional factors on their own or combined can in some regions (and anywhere else arguably should) invalidate consent from a legal perspective; these include an actual result of serious injury, consequent fatality, use of a strong mind-altering drug, and the presence of a significant mental disorder such as a severe case of sexual masochism disorder. The image is related, and documents the standards to which it could be argued people worldwide, most especially those within public for-profit pornography, should be held — without limitation.
>>16393> Maybe updating all of my pastes to take on the roles of judge and jury, as I did in the post quoted above, will be more effective... That's at least something that has not yet been tried. Perhaps, in this day and age, upping the ante is the only way to get through to people about these matters.Quite simply there is a massive amount of incriminating evidence out there within public pornography. Many viewers, children included, are taking lessons from blatant violent crime. Many of those viewers desire to emulate what they see and a large proportion of them do so, or at least make the attempt. Current and former politicians in governments worldwide who were or are in a position to do something about this terrible situation that has gone on for far too long, yet failed to do so, should face severe consequences.
No.16447
>>10443Reiterating:
> Concerning anal intercourse and other significant anoreceptive activities, "done correctly" may not even be possible for a variety of reasons in any receptive person's particular case (due e.g. to one or more preexisting anorectal conditions, a penis that is simply too girthy, etc.), and is likely to be highly impractical in other cases (e.g. how do you determine what constitutes "too rapid" when there are delicate tissues that can be easily damaged without pain not far inside?).> Anal stretching is not safe for anyone with intact anal sphincter complex muscles, nor is insertion of lengthy objects: 1) the internal anal sphincter muscle can be damaged without pain, and 2) colorectal perforation can occur without immediate pain."‘We just really like to be adventurous with our sexuality.’ Legally, though, people can’t consent to just anything. “There’s an important body of law that declares it illegal to consent to certain types of physical harm, whether it’s sexual or not,” said Wendy Murphy, a professor of sexual violence law at New England School of Law. “You can’t consent to torture. You cannot consent to serious bodily injury.”"
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/23/style/bdsm-kink-consent.html (The Boundary Between Abuse and B.D.S.M.)
Anorectal violence as defined, which is also known as "rough anal" among other terms, is far too common especially in pornography. Anal intercourse involving rapid thrusting with a girthy penis for a prolonged duration most certainly can result in great bodily harm / great bodily injury (a defined legal term in some regions) and even death for a receptive person:
"We describe a case of a 45-year-old white woman who sustained devastating homicidal colorectal trauma that served as a primary cause of death in the setting of rape. Our patient sustained a 15-cm laceration of the anterior rectal wall and ultimately died of peritonitis and sepsis."
"Fatal anorectal trauma in the setting of sexual assault: case report and literature survey." The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 2010 Sep; 31(3): 273-7. PMID 20512029. doi:10.1097/paf.0b013e3181e13269.
No.16734
> I'm thinking a catalyst will be needed before many people seriously and effectively address the major matters to which I've been trying to draw attention for far too many years. That catalyst most likely will be one or more people taking justice into their own hands, i.e. bloodshed.>>14686> I have a very strong desire to start writing things like this: Steve Huffman, CEO of Reddit, is facilitating widespread criminal violence along with factors contributing to it with his failure for many years to enforce his own site's policies on subreddits such as /r/painal, /r/roughanal, and /r/sex. He is one person who should be held accountable by any means necessary. The same could be said for people involved with those mentioned subreddits, among others. And, now that Reddit is a public company, now or in the future there could be a profit aspect involved as well: Reddit employees may well be profiting from violent crime so as long as those subreddits featuring such crime remain. They also may be profiting from factors facilitating those crimes so long as people on subreddits such as /r/sex are allowed to spread health-harmful falsehoods in violation of Reddit's official policy (one problem here is that /r/sex's official "sex-positive" policy gives moderators an excuse to censor factual information as being "sex-negative," setting aside the point that "anal sex" is a misnomer...).Perhaps I should start posting material that quite possibly will result in the administrative censorship I experienced on the .xyz site* beginning anew on this site. It seems as if there is nothing to lose when people very obviously are not listening anyway.
* The censorship began there before I posted any such material. That is, I was being reasonable until given reason to behave otherwise. Maybe it is a better idea to always behave unreasonably...
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." --George Bernard Shaw
No.16741 KONTRA
>>16734> George Bernard ShawPsychopathic Stalinist, who denied mass hunger in USSR and praised Lysenko. Is he your role model?
No.16743 KONTRA
>>16741don't try with this person, there is no point
>>16734> when people very obviously are not listening anyway. No.16760
>>14685> pathological sexual sadism and masochism most certainly are involved when viewers and/or participants are deriving pleasure from pain and injury>>16740> it's a normal part of human sexuality. Women are weak and passive gender, and men are dominant and active.It should be abundantly clear that I was talking about the derivation of pleasure from pain and injury.
As for the rest of your post, I won't even bother with those ridiculous assertions, red herrings, and an absence of proof.
>>16741Both the ad hominem and the red herring logical fallacies are covered in the OP image within the paste titled "Logically-fallacious diversionary tactics."
Concerning the attached images: The subforum depicted looks much the same today, with numerous threads devoted to anal insanity* typically being bumped daily.
* Every definition of the word applies, i.e. madness, extreme folly, etc.
No.16761
>>16760*attached image (attaching more than one didn't seem to work at least without javascript)
No.16815
The Merck Professional Manual's article below about sexual sadism disorder was quoted in past editions of the Anorectal Trends, Risks, and Anatomy compilation as part of Trends & Associations (the 2018/03 edition at
https://paste2.org/9XFgn0tb was the last one to include it, although it may be included again in the future). Note that both the URL and the article text have changed over the years, but the core gist of the text has remained the same so far.
"Sexual sadism is a form of paraphilia, but mild sadistic sexual behavior is a common sexual practice between consenting adults that is usually limited in scope, is practiced in a way that does not cause harm, and does not meet the clinical criteria for a paraphilic disorder. However, in some people, the behaviors escalate to the point of harm. Determining when sadism [and masochism] becomes pathologic is a matter of degree."
"Most sexual sadists have persistent fantasies in which sexual excitement results from suffering inflicted on the partner, consenting or not. When practiced with nonconsenting partners, sexual sadism constitutes criminal activity and is likely to continue until the sadist is apprehended. However, sexual sadism is not synonymous with rape, it is a complex amalgam of coerced sex and power exerted over the victim. Sexual sadism is diagnosed in < 10% of rapists but is present in 37 to 75% of people who have committed sexually motivated homicides."
"Sexual sadism is particularly dangerous when associated with antisocial personality disorder. This combination of disorders may result in criminal sadism involving kidnapping or abduction of unwilling parties who may be harmed or killed (1). Individuals with both conditions are considered particularly recalcitrant to psychiatric treatment (2). Such individuals, when apprehended and convicted, are sometimes civilly committed as sexually violent predators for decades due to the lack of effective treatments (3)."
https://web.archive.org/web/20240207004000/https://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/psychiatric-disorders/paraphilias-and-paraphilic-disorders/sexual-sadism-disorder No.16879
"Tolerance and apathy are the last virtues of a dying society." --Aristotle (attributed)
Note that an archaic use of the word "virtue" does not always have positive connotations as common usages do today. The archaic version means "effective force; power or potency." I doubt that the original person making that statement was praising apathy, and so it makes sense that they also condemned tolerance as another prevailing force of a dying society.
>>16734> "The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." --George Bernard ShawIn other words, far too many people are all-too-willing to fall in line and live in a highly flawed and even decaying society. It takes one or more people willing to break the mold to actually effect positive change. History has demonstrated many times that mass bloodshed (also known as "war" when it's officially sanctioned by a government) is one means of bringing about great change that ultimately leads to a better world, has it not? Certainly it's not reasonable, but it is effective...
No.16880
>>14686> I have a very strong desire to start writing things like this: Steve Huffman, CEO of Reddit, is facilitating widespread criminal violence along with factors contributing to it with his failure for many years to enforce his own site's policies on subreddits such as /r/painal, /r/roughanal, and /r/sex. He is one person who should be held accountable by any means necessary. The same could be said for people involved with those mentioned subreddits, among others.Assuming that someone does try to hold Steve Huffman et al. accountable by any means necessary, a fitting "calling card" would be to finish with rectal impalement (whether that proves to be the fatal act or merely a final addition).
https://web.archive.org/web/20240319031314/https://ernstchan.xyz/int/thread/90853#91389> >Create and post an image called "TAKE ACTION." >Nobody seems to do so. >This has been the case for far too many years.> What will it take for that to change? (This is a rhetorical question, as I already have some ideas. I am interested in hearing others' thoughts regardless.)I wrote this up a while back, but refrained from posting it until now:
Scapegoating is one idea, along with "fighting fire with fire" (i.e., returning violence with violence). Among others, I may advocate killing Wikipedia's Jimmy Wales (he has a history with pornography to boot by way of Bomis; it may not actually be scapegoating: Jimmy Wales could well be a pornography industry asset.). That's because it may be difficult or even impossible to track down individual contributors responsible for the misinformation/disinformation I've covered in my Wikipedia critique that has been present in English Wikipedia's articles for MANY YEARS.
No.16882 KONTRA
He who fights with perpetrators of anorectal violence might take care lest he thereby become a perpetrator of anorectal violence. And if you gaze for long into an anus, the anus gazes also into you.
No.16884 KONTRA
>>16734>That is, I was being reasonable until given reason to behave otherwise. Maybe it is a better idea to always behave unreasonably...Whenever I think of being reasonable, I think of anorectal violence guy.
>>16882>And if you gaze for long into an anus, the anus gazes also into you.I think it is about time that we got a meta anorectal violence thread, where we can discuss what rampant anorectal violence threading can do to a MF.
No.16885
The problem is that people just are not listening. More than reason alone, it seems, will be required to change that.
>>9269> It is suggestive of a nefarious agenda and/or psychopathy to purposely and repeatedly try to draw attention away from anorectal anatomy and physiology, rampant anorectal violence, associated traumatic risks, and an epidemic of ignorance and misinformation. These topics, plus the voluminous amount of information from others, are far more important than anything about a lone person trying to raise awareness of them. It is very likely that pornography industries utilize psychopaths as deceitful and manipulative "psyop" agents when some pornography companies already make use of them for perpetration of violence against one or more others.Does anyone take issue with my own incitement of violence? Then surely they also must take issue with the glorification and (by way of inspiration) incitement of violence by subreddits such as /r/painal and /r/roughanal as well. If they do not, then they are hypocrites.
>>10354> "Do not post content that encourages, glorifies, incites, or calls for violence or physical harm against an individual (including oneself) or a group of people..."> https://web.archive.org/web/20230719232538/https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/360043513151> Also relevant: "Note that health misinformation, namely falsifiable health information that encourages or poses a significant risk of physical harm to the reader, also violates the Rule."> For far too many years now the subreddits mentioned above have been encouraging, glorifying, and inciting anorectal violence in particular that arguably should easily constitute severely criminal behavior when more than one person is involved (at the very least for potentially-lethal outcomes/sequelae). Perhaps people at high levels of Reddit should be held accountable: not only for failing to uphold their own site's policies, but also for enabling the spread of very dangerous violent behavior along with health-harmful falsehoods and omissions facilitating it on subreddits such as /r/sex. No.16887
From posts elsewhere that I quoted in
>>15893> I've encountered some people out there who seem to have a nefarious agenda (perhaps even operating out of a playbook using tactics and fallacies I pointed out previously, among others), or who at least seem very intent on wasting my time by having me go in circles pointing out the same things over and over again.> I'm thinking a catalyst will be needed before many people seriously and effectively address the major matters to which I've been trying to draw attention for far too many years. That catalyst most likely will be one or more people taking justice into their own hands, i.e. bloodshed.In far too many threads of mine I end up going in circles pointing out the same things over and over again.
>>16885> The problem is that people just are not listening.That's one possible explanation, anyway. The other one I've come up with is a nefarious agenda. I wrote in the past about the possibility of a smear campaign; perhaps I'll quote some relevant old posts of mine in one or more future posts.
>>9269> These topics, plus the voluminous amount of information from others, are far more important than anything about a lone person trying to raise awareness of them.People would do well to keep that in mind. Anything I do, and anything about me whatsoever, really doesn't matter in the least by comparison. That is why there is no need for me to defend myself. I am not on trial here: many violent people are, as well as those who enable them.
No.16894 KONTRA
>>16880> I may advocate killing Wikipedia's Jimmy WalesIt is called murder. Don't whitewash your language. You advocate the murder of that person, which is a punishable offense by law. (That your country allows murder in their law, aka death penalty, is a topic i don't want to go too deep into. As long as you allow murder, you are not fighting criminals; you are supporting them instead.)
>>16887> Anything I do, and anything about me whatsoever, really doesn't matter in the least by comparison.Great take. As long as there is something i perceive as worse as my own actions i can do anything and others shouldn't be allowed to critique me or my actions.
The fact, that you think finding anal stimulation pleasurable is worse than murder, says volumes about you.Either write your manifesto and go ham or go to therapy.
Stop annoying people, who, according to your words, are not even listening. You can pay professionals and force them to listen to you, aka therapy.
No.16896 KONTRA
>That your country allows murder in their law, aka death penalty, is a topic i don't want to go too deep into. OP, hit this anorectal violence apologist
>>16894 with the red herring copypasta.
No.16899
Going in circles? Check. People ignoring what is written _especially_ about logically-fallacious diversionary tactics, or even intentionally using such tactics (not necessarily limited to what I covered)? Indeed. Reiterating:
>>9269> Misrepresentation—introducing a distorted version of something—is another means of creating a diversion. Attacking a fabrication in order to suggest refutal of what was actually presented constitutes a straw man logical fallacy.>>10443> Speaking [of] people ignoring the paste covering logically-fallacious diversionary tactics... Yet again: Ultimately this is not about me.>>16446> Anorectal violence is defined in the OP image's top paste: anoreceptive activity involving a combination of rapid thrusting, considerable girth, and a prolonged duration. There are, or arguably most certainly should be, criminal implications for people who perpetrate anorectal violence against one or more others due to the possibility of serious injury and even potential for subsequent fatality. Furthermore, various additional factors on their own or combined can in some regions (and anywhere else arguably should) invalidate consent from a legal perspective; these include an actual result of serious injury, consequent fatality, use of a strong mind-altering drug, and the presence of a significant mental disorder such as a severe case of sexual masochism disorder. The image is related, and documents the standards to which it could be argued people worldwide, most especially those within public for-profit pornography, should be held — without limitation.> Quite simply there is a massive amount of incriminating evidence out there within public pornography. Many viewers, children included, are taking lessons from blatant violent crime. Many of those viewers desire to emulate what they see and a large proportion of them do so, or at least make the attempt. Current and former politicians in governments worldwide who were or are in a position to do something about this terrible situation that has gone on for far too long, yet failed to do so, should face severe consequences. No.16954
>Someone misrepresenting what was covered and trying to make this about one lone and insignificant person right after a post quoting what was written about misrepresentation and another post pointing out "Ultimately this is not about me."Seriously? Can the presence of one or more people with a nefarious agenda and/or psychopathy even be denied at this point?
>>15048> You're only proving my points about people not listening (possibly due to a nefarious agenda; at this point I'm quite used to people trying to smear me, twisting my words and meaning, etc.) and about wasting far too much of my time defending myself.>>10480> Whether you actually have trouble understanding what was posted is questionable. Your posts bring this to mind (particularly the part about deceit and manipulation):> "People diagnosed with APD [antisocial personality disorder, aka psychopathy] in prison populations act as if they have no conscience. They move through society as predators, paying little attention to the consequences of their actions. They cannot understand feelings of guilt or remorse. Deceit and manipulation characterize their interpersonal relationships."> https://web.archive.org/web/20171002164816/http://www.minddisorders.com/A-Br/Antisocial-personality-disorder.html>>14994> I wasted far too much time in the past defending myself. That needs to end.Indeed it does. I'm a terrible person (but nowhere near as terrible as those I oppose). There, I said it. Now people should focus on actually important topics (i.e., nothing about one lone and insignificant person).
No.16955
At some point many people will have to seriously try to do something about all of this (i.e. issues covered in the OP image, quoted below), but...
> I'm thinking a catalyst will be needed before many people seriously and effectively address the major matters to which I've been trying to draw attention for far too many years. That catalyst most likely will be one or more people taking justice into their own hands, i.e. bloodshed.That's humanity for ya. Oh, and also some people trying to focus on anything but the actual topics at hand and even diverting the discussion: That's 100% humanity too where the subject matter is concerned even before considering the possibility of a nefarious agenda, psychopathy, a [self-]destructive mental disorder, etc.
>>9269> Erotic anorectal violence—anoreceptive activity involving a combination of rapid thrusting, considerable girth, and a prolonged duration—is rampant, constituting one of the greatest contributors to societal decadence today:> • Due to its ubiquity in pornography, several generations now have grown up masturbating to, demanding more of, and seeking to emulate violent behavior that arguably should easily be considered severely criminal when more than one person is involved (at the very least for potentially-lethal outcomes/sequelae). Perpetrators of this violence against one or more others going unpunished is a major problem, as is potentially-incriminating evidence being sold for profit and inspiring countless viewers.> • Widespread apathy, (often willful) ignorance, and misinformation about anorectal anatomy, physiology, and health are enabling people with (self-)destructive tendencies to have a field day with such violence and to effectively spread disinformation. That unrestrained hedonism is contributing greatly to societal decay. Far too many people neither wish to think about nor seriously discuss anorectal matters, so rampant anorectal violence and its consequences "fly under the radar;" people would much rather focus on some other (in many cases far less dangerous) kind of erotic abuse.> [...] relevant English Wikipedia articles for many years have had major flaws. [...] Since many people seem to rely on Wikipedia (regardless of whether they should or not), those flaws contribute to rampant anorectal violence along with misinformation facilitating it. No.16956 KONTRA
>>16955> That catalyst most likely will be one or more people taking justice into their own hands, i.e. bloodshed.> That's humanity for ya.We know.
Don't forget to @ us.
Also: plz don't target the hot chicks; target the dudes/gays. else they could misunderstand your action for coming from some incel mindset. tyWithout the /s:
Please correct me if any of these points are wrong.
> You have an aesthetic anus fetish> Some of the anuses you do not like to look at because of remnant artifacts of (self-)harmful behaviour, coined "anorectal violence" by you> You want to go amok, because people do not share your aesthetic anus fetish and not every anus is aesthetically pleasing to you> You believe you have the right to do so, because >>16887 "Anything I do, and anything about me whatsoever, really doesn't matter in the least by comparison [to an unaesthetic anus]"Don't pretend you are not hinting heavily towards that direction of actions without explicitly mentioning it; we can read between the lines.> ???> Profitt. has an aesthetic ear fetish and wants to homicide everyone wearing earrings or doing ring-fighting
:^) No.16958
>>16899> Going in circles? Check. People ignoring what is written _especially_ about logically-fallacious diversionary tactics, or even intentionally using such tactics (not necessarily limited to what I covered)? Indeed.>>10443> I recognize when someone is intentionally wasting my time, trying to smear me, put words into my mouth, etc.There doesn't seem to be any realistic explanation other than a nefarious agenda at this point. I encountered at least one similar person in the past:
https://archive.is/202003/https://astrochan.net/b/res/36010.html#37243> I also wrote that the person in question is very obviously wasting my time. That remains true. The person does not even acknowledge some of my points and also makes false claims about me (I will refrain from speculating as to why, although I do have some ideas: none of them are good).Interestingly, the person in question also complained about my not using post references on Astrochan (post 37256).
>>10480> I wrote in the previous thread that I would ignore this apparently-German person, or someone very similar. This is my last intentional response to him or her.I'll be here should anyone else wish to actually have a two-sided discussion about actual topics of relevance and at least acknowledging points that were made, in some cases far too many times (particularly ones about logically-fallacious diversionary tactics, this being about greater matters than anything pertaining to one lone messenger, etc).
No.16960 KONTRA
We need a pride flag for aesthetic anus fetish.
No.16987
Here are points I made back in 2016 from
https://web.archive.org/web/20210207051427/https://desuarchive.org/gif/thread/9369909/#9374267 (originally split into two posts)
1. The rectal lining that is found only a few centimeters past the anal opening and beyond is delicate and insensitive to pain, which is one reason why rapid thrusting is always a bad idea. Furthermore, enemas and lubricants can cause problems themselves. An enema typically removes the protective mucus barrier. Some enemas and lubricants also can (further) irritate, damage, and/or increase the fragility of the rectal mucosa -- and that's before we consider what sexual trauma might do. Both rectal inflammation and fecal bacterial infections (or associated abscesses/fistulae) were found to be common amongst anoreceptive people.
2. The loosely-attached hemorrhoidal cushions become engorged with blood when the anal sphincters and puborectalis relax as a person bears down. That's another reason why rapid thrusting is always a bad idea, especially in combination with a girthy penis/object and a prolonged duration.
3. Anal sex and insertions with a girthy penis/object combined with rapid thrusting and a prolonged duration are the norm in porn, even for "first" anal sex scenes. It is simply not possible for anal and rectal injuries (and serious/chronic/permanent consequences) to be uncommon due to the physiology and anatomy of the anorectal area.
4. Some receptive people--including pornstars--have spoken out about resultant problems. That's not very surprising at all. Also, there are plenty of obviously [self-]destructive people in porn industries worldwide -- sexual sadists, sexual masochists, and sadistic sociopaths are having a field day with anal abuse. It should be obvious that there is a problem when there are people messing around with or even fucking another person's prolapsed rectum.
5. In many cases there are obvious, externally-visible changes to a receptive person's anus. Plenty of young, fit women start out in porn with a healthy anus that resembles the anatomical ideal but it rapidly degrades at some point, especially after she starts having receptive anal sex in porn. I've seen that happen many times, and it's one major reason why I'm so fed up with the rampant anal abuse. (If the tougher, externally-visible tissue is damaged, then it's likely that other/worse issues exist further inside where the tissues are even more delicate.)
6. Those visible changes typically go unnoticed by the vast majority of people, and that [willful] ignorance is part of the problem. Too many people just don't want to think about (much less learn about and pay attention to) anorectal health and the appearance of another person's anus (especially throughout a porn career). That ignorance definitely contributes to the rampant anal abuse that has been going on for much too long now.