>>8457You're like someone complaining about McDonald's selling crappy food. Correct, but besides the point. It's McDonald's, not the Auberge d'Ill. And it's your own damn fault for eating there. Maybe go to an image board afterwards and complain that the big Mac sucks, because yours was not sweet enough? Again, correct, the big Mac sucks. But it's not that it sucks because it's not sweet enough.
>Imagine whiteknighting for some hollywood millionaire despite claiming you don't even like the show. > claimingSo we are now beyond the point of critiquing tv-productions, we have now progressed to the stage where you tell me what I really, secretly like?
>I mean, what was your point? Again, your opinion on that ten year old show is pointless, just doesn't matter, show made money, the data is in. Things are done to achieve certain aims, and success can only be measured in whether those aims were achieved.
>And it still doesn't matter what the actor thinks or doesI was under the impression you thought it was the actors and writers job to make the character likeable to you. Otherwise, why complain that you didn't like this or that character because he/she was irritating and ugly?
Either you assume, that all characters should be likeable and pretty, this then implies that you also think writers and actors should portray them in such a way, and the actors cast should be as cute as possible.
Or you think characters may be irritating and/or ugly. But then, why do you complain about this character being irritating and ugly?
>and frankly I don't care, and that was irrelevant to the subject of that post anyway and maybe if you weren't apparently a bit slow, albeit very smug, you would understand that.You are the worst know-it-all on this board and I recognize your each and every post, you are the most arrogant person I ever witnessed in my entire live.
>At least you admitted that evaluating the quality of something by the money it makesrather evaluate by the amount of non-irritating characters and pretty girls, right? Deduce one point per irritating or ugly character, add two points for each cute girl, there you have your measure of quality.
> is silly. Where do I admit that? It's obviously the opposite of silly, it's rational and economical. That show was produced to make money. It made a lot of money. That makes it an intense success. If you want to watch something that isn't made to name money from people watching it, watch German publicly fine bullcrap instead, that is made not to speak to the masses, but to appeal to the schmucks handing out the tax money.
>Maybe there is hope for you. Keep it upI don't need hope. And for you, there can be no hope. Please do the world favor and stick your hands in a mixer so I won't have to read more of your incongruent, incoherent, child-like pseudo thoughts.