[ b / int / meta ] [ fefe ] [ test ] [ FAQ / Rules / HowTo / Stats ] [ Radio / BNR ]

/int/ - certified time wasters

Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

 No.19650

p1.jpg (77.75 KB, 612x403)

p2.jpg (80.37 KB, 686x386)

p3.jpg (197.65 KB, 768x1024)

p4.png (80.9 KB, 1000x496)

Opening at a memorable date

 No.19651

burning-man.webp (94.88 KB, 760x400)

lucas.jpg (996.54 KB, 2000x1207)

mit6.jpg (352.66 KB, 1024x683)

I came up with the following topics. You're welcome to add yours.
1. Everyday life in USA. Our (foreigners') perception of America skews toward people who leave a trail in the internet: terminally online weirdos and professional talking heads. A lot is left behind.
2. Terminally online people are also important because they're the active minorities who make changes.
3. Silicon valley, academia, Hollywood, military, churches and other societal structures.
4. American art: from mass consumption slop to something more elitist. I'm personally fan of sci-fi books, comedy cartoons and rock music.
5. I'll try to restrain myself from Z-funposting about imminent collapse and so on, but I promise nothing.

 No.19652

Good idea I support this.
Actually I have been talking a lot about life in the US with an American online. Genuinely fascinating place.

 No.19686

central valley.jpg (264.46 KB, 837x1233)

Landscape-Suicide-19874.png (428.18 KB, 640x475)

Hot Dogs, Cheerios & Cheetos. America is a corporate landscape in my mind.

What's is to add is US literature. I think literature is a very good way to look at the US.
Also, photography is a very good way to grapple with the US.

 No.22066

I discovered that american women generally speak in a higher pitch than non-american women. This is antiproportional to their bodyweight though. You can always identify a fat chick by her voice.

t. has been in contact with americans rather frequently lately

 No.22077

>>22026
> people who can afford to leave cities do
This sounds counter-intuitive. Why people "afford to leave cities" instead of "affording to live in cities". It's an arbitrary and unusual decision to maintain law and order in suburbs but not in cities. And to spend public money on maintaining automobile based infrastructure instead of cleaning cities from trash. IIRC term "Broken windows approach" comes from the attempt to make New York safer and cleaner. Conservative chuds on x.com praise former NY mayor Rudy Giuliani for that.

BTW while reading "Disappearing city" I started to watch travel show about America (I watched the show already, but about another countries) and after watching - to browse google street views on the cowered places.
So far I watched episodes about Salt Lake City, Chicago and Detroit. The towns' layouts match my stereotype: small downtown with high rising buildings surrounded by mcmansions.
Mormons glow really hard. For example, do you know that they keep huge genealogical database for the whole world? It's because their religion allows baptism for dead people.
Detroit is better than I imagined, it seems to be recovering.
Didn't know that Chicago has underground layer populated by hobos. So cyberpunk... While otherwise city has retro wibes.

Watchlist for future:
Dallas, Seattle, Arizona, Boston, Savannah, Reno, Sacramento, Colorado (south park!), Atlanta.

 No.22080

>>22077
Law and order is the suburbs is easy- they simply filter out poverty with a high barrier to entry: a car, home ownership(or increasingly home rental) and time to commute. The only law enforcement I ever see are patrol cars montoring traffic speed. Cities- with their increased human friction- are significantly harder to police. When politicians try- as Giuliani infamously did, they overstep and violate citizen rights with things like Terry Stops:

https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_stop

Yes, they are technically legal and not a violation of rights, but- having been personally stopped multiple times (in the city) they are a poor tool which is too easy for lazy cops to abuse.

 No.22083

American Police Game.png (453.41 KB, 960x677)

>>22080
>SQF tactics did not seem to actually address crime either, as only 6% of stops yielded an arrest
>only 6%
I don't mean to justify this approach, but six percent is more than I'd expect.
>Items that are discovered during pat-downs that are incriminating, like clean needles, condoms, and other harm reduction tools, are used less to prevent arrest
>condoms
I don't understand if Wikipedia means condoms are incriminating by some unspoken cultural bias that lumps concealed condom carrying together with crime in the mindsets of some law enforcers, or whether citizens fear the condoms might explicitly be used against them as a pretext of some sort, or none of the above. Please offer your mansplainings and (un)informed guesses.

 No.22086

>>22066
>You can always identify a fat chick by her voice.
I never realised this till now…

 No.22087

Behavioral Sciences & the Law.jpg (148.48 KB, 1066x411)

>>22083
Carrying condoms can be used as evidence of prostition. The wikipedia source article doesn't mention a quantity, but I assume more than 1 or 2. To avoid the risk of being caught carrying them, and thus incriminating themselves, prostitutes will not use them.

 No.22088 KONTRA

>>22087
>prostition.
Prostitution. Mobile chrome doesn't spell-check.

 No.22092

>>22087
Thank you, I see.
I had followed the link to the source before asking, but it threw a "please enable JS", and since I didn't want to find out where that would end ("Please enable cookies"? "Please solve this Captcha™ to prove you're human"? "Please register"?), I didn't bother.

>>22086
Don't believe the German.

 No.22095

>>22080
>they simply filter out poverty with a high barrier to entry
I had not previously thought of that, except on a larger scale about affluent remote islands like Iceland and New Zealand.
So there's not much hope for some less environmentally destructive alternative to urban sprawl and motorized individual commuting to gain acceptance unless richer people also find a similarly convenient way to control the movement of poorer people to keep them away.

 No.22096 KONTRA

>>22095
God, what a disgustingly leftshit post. And what a disgustingly leftshit person.

Do you honestly expect people to move to voluntarily move to crime-ridden shitholes in the name of social reform? Or would you just like to deport everyone?

The criminal is a socially friendly element, he must be treated with care and compassion! Abolish the prisons, let the criminals roam free, they will establish terror against the bourgeoisie and further the socialist revolution!

 No.22105

>>22092
>I didn't want to find out where that would end
An academic journal which wanted me to pay $12 to read the referenced paper. Nope. Libgen.

>>22095
>So there's not much hope for some less environmentally destructive alternative to urban sprawl and motorized individual commuting to gain acceptance
Afraid not. Cheap and convenient public transit from the suburbs into the city would seem an easy solution but, as I mentioned earlier, those routes are controversial. There was even a local movement against building sidewalks on a certain road. As you likely know from our history, America does not have a good track record when it comes to integration.

 No.22112

I kinda wanna travel the US. Go on a road trip. Shoot a gun, eat a burger oe whatever. But it's quite expensive (tho flights aren't too bad actually) and I don't have any friends there I could visit. Still gotta happen in the next few years, I need to demystify the country for myself.

 No.22113 KONTRA

>>22112
>thinking in a few years, german boys will be allowed to visit god's won country without paying a massive entry-fee to keep the US of A free of Europeon foreigners

 No.22124

>>22105
Interesting, thanks.
>America does not have a good track record when it comes to integration
I don't know if I've been thinking of it as worse than any random society of the human race.

 No.22125

Average American.jpg (210.36 KB, 1280x1019)

I want to be an American so much it's unreal.

Imagine being able to save via 401k, having a highly paid white collar jerb at some dam power station somewhere in the LCOL-Midwest and bam, you're able to retire anywhere in the world at 40 with 2-3 million in the bank.
The example is just so specific because I saw some documentary about such a power plant and the work happening there some time ago.

And if you dislike your job or location fuck it, move across the whole country somewhere between both coasts.
This borderline nomadic flexibility that Americans have is something great.

 No.22126

Just remembered that, while it doesn't alleviate the sprawl, perhaps the advent of remote work and remote education allows for generation of more wealth at the same amount of commuting traffic if not less. It enables some white people to work from the safety of their burbs, and possibly some city dwellers to work from the relative safety of their homes at any time of the day. It's not specifically American though, and I wonder how much of an impact it has on a wider scale. I know many people are glad to have the option, for example because they can look after their baby while remotely doing something that would've otherwise been out of reach. For myself, I had mostly just considered how I wouldn't have to endure the occasional bad breath of some customers and fellow mass transit commuters, not to mention infections.

 No.22153

highway driving.jpg (1.01 MB, 3648x2736)

>>22125
Starting over somewhere else is every American's Plan B.



[Return][Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ b / int / meta ] [ fefe ] [ test ] [ FAQ / Rules / HowTo / Stats ] [ Radio / BNR ]