No.19406
Let’s continue!
Previous:
>>7 No.19445
>>19443Downloaded picrel today btw.
Read "Howl" by Ginsberg recently. Cool and relatable - I recall the times when I was a non-conformist leftie teenager surrounded by huge materialist normies. Also reminds me my own experiments with its repetitiveness though I went somewhat further :)
No.19446
>>19414>like a some porn stars suck dicks for the cameraWouldn't that be a lack of enthusiasm, as the actions are ultimately driven for ulterior motive? Never had the makings of a writer.
No.19447 KONTRA
>>19414I am not a person like you at all, thank you very much.
No.19448
>>19446t. expert cocksucker
>>19447like he said you would suck it up, cuck.
No.19454
Martin Stanley – How to be a Civil Servant
Read this in yet another ill-conceived attempt at satisfying my fetish for learning about and partaking in bureaucracy.
I think I actually liked it, though I’m unsure how much or what I got out of it. (But I was comforted reading it.)
It goes into some details about working with ministers, other civil servants and handling situations and so on, but a substantial portion of the book is taken up by managerial self-help advice about talking with stakeholders and empowering coworkers (which the author uses for “Delegating a task with autonomy to make decisions”).
Obviously this is an idealised picture the author is painting. It’s how things “should be”. This leads to a somewhat comical running gag where he’d describe what a civil servant should do, and then goes on to say that “Sadly, too often, civil servants…” and then he basically describes a Yes Minister scene.
Though props to the author that he only made a single Yes Minister reference throughout the entire thing, which I think is good because it’s kind of like writing a book on the Mafia without referencing the Godfather. Easier than it seems, healthier than it looks.
James A. Benn – Tea in China
Some people were hyping it in twitter. Why not I guess, why not read a book on tea?
It’s okay. It’s another one of those “200 page academic books that feel too long despite being really short”.
Full of quotes from primary sources and just like with the Tokugawa book, the author spends way too much time repeating themselves after each source. Essentially it’s too padded. It should be like like a two part study in a journal or something, not a book.
Regardless, there’s a lot of good stuff in it and a lot of work went into it so it’s not a lazy book, it’s just that the format it has is not very suitable to the content.
Worth a flip-through for the chapters that seem interesting to you. But otherwise I wasn’t really going crazy for it. It wasn’t “inspiring”. It’s “one of the books of all time”.
No.19455 KONTRA
>>19446Aha! You are a good student of literature, Ernesto! What you point out, albeit involuntarily, is what makes literature literature among other things - polysemy!
I was thinking of the "hyperbolically enthusiastically slurping a cock and making sounds like it's some grandiose five star food dish that is enjoyed" kind of blowjob porn.
No.20083
>>20054Dixon’s “Man after Man” is also a very fun speculative evolution book if you liked All tomorrows.
The illustrations are reminiscent of old children’s educational books which adds to the appeal imho.
I remember reading it on my phone in the hospital in some Russian pirate website.
No.20084
>>20083Thanks, downloaded!
No.20168
I'm in the middle of a Celinian obsession. After finally finishin "voyage au bout de la nuit". I got into it again after reading that the insults of captain Haddock were very probably taken from the Celine's antisemitic pamphlets. In a way it's hard for me to believe Céline, his dark humor on his percieved darkness of the condition of man, his hallucinations, it feels me with joy and existential revolt. And this only with voyage, I cannot wait to read the rest of his work.
I'm currently in the middle of "Mort à Crédit". The french wikipedia article of the novel redirect to the emetophilia wikipedia article, it's funny. For the time being, his novel's avatar vomited twice on his mother and once on his father.
In the french academic literary canon, he's supposed to be one of the two greatest author of the 20th with Proust, weird century.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ITjOa-LD74 No.20197
>>20168> In the french academic literary canon, he's supposed to be one of the two greatest author of the 20th with Proust, weird century.What place do Camus and Sartre have in this pantheon?
No.20198
>>20197I may not be a reliable source.
Camus is considered middle school or highschool French class literature. Treating the stranger is almost inevitable at that age, I did an entire 20 page essay on his protagonist when I was 16. Same for Sisyphus, high-school philosophy. I think his international recognition comes first of all because he is so easy to translate.
Sartre, I think people see him more as a public figure and a play writer than an author or a philosopher, even more than Camus. According to Beauvoir he was extremely inspired by Celine and his writing style radically changed once he read « voyage au bout de la nuit ». He’s like a may 68 figure, even if he has not really participated to anything. He’s also read in high school.
No.20199
>>20198No adult (mind) would ever concern themselves with Camus. It's just a different kind of edgy for edgy teenagers than, say, a superficial view on Nietzsche.
No.20200
>>20198> I did an entire 20 page essay on his protagonist when I was 16.That's a lot. Did you study in some lyceum focused on humanities? I don't think that I have ever wrote essay longer than 5 pages.
BTW I decided to study French as 3-rd language few months ago. There is no practical purpose, it's just a hobby. But as a pleasant bonus there are French movies, songs, books, etc without translation. French culture is very rich, after all. That won't be soon obviously, it will probably take 2-3 years at current rate (10-15 minutes of practice per day) to reach a decent level. For now I'm reading translations.
For instance, I've read a fragment about Gavroche by Hugo. Well, it reminds me of Soviet writers. 100% socrealism. Given the timing, it's they who imitated his style.
Balzac - just a few short stories, another kind of propaganda about old regime. It's just some dirt about how priests and nobles were corrupt and lustful and courtesans bossed them around.
"The second sex" - almost a half of the book is done, will write more then it's finished, but for now it strongly reminds me of "Das capital": a huge influential Talmud with historical and other broad overview though prism of narrow ideology (dialectics/existentialism)
Also I've read "The Little Prince". Not sure if this book is actually for kids, more like for adults. But it's ideal for non-native speakers because of its simple language. I hope to reread it in original in few months. Liked it a lot.
No.20211
>>20200> you study in some lyceum focused on humanities?No, I was focusing on mathematics and physics. Swiss public education system is complicated, every canton used to be completely responsible of its educative system up until very recently where some accords among French speaking cantons have been made to uniformise education.To summarize, at ~16yo in Gymnasiums, people are supposed to write and defend an ~20 pages essay about the topic they choose as long as a teacher in the school is ok with helping them on the topic, teachers can also propose specific topics. I chose a humanity related topic just to test something else.
> decided to study French as 3-rd languageGodspeed
>le petit princeMy mother read it to me when I was a kid. I still remember some scenes vividly. I think it’s one of the best selling books in history. It’s still very trendy in Paris…
No.21302
What do you think of EC book club, somewhere in January-February? We choose a book, then by the end of every week we read some part of it and then discuss together.
What books would you like to read and discuss? Fiction or non-fiction, both are possible.
No.21304
>>21302If we manage to pick something reasonably short like under 300 pages or so I'd be down to give it a try.
I've been meaning to start Là-Bas by Huysmans so that would be a suggestion off the top of my head, should be reasonably edgy and EC tier. Though it might be a bit on the longer side (bit over 300 pages), so I'm also open for suggestions.
No.21306
>>21302Obviously Das Kapital by Friedrich Marx and Karl Engels.
No.21310 KONTRA
>>21306You mean A Tőke by Marx Károly and Engels Frigyes.
No.21324
>>21304> If we manage to pick something reasonably short like I agree, something short would be good for the first time.
> I've been meaning to start Là-Bas by HuysmansCool, seems to be a good choice. BTW in one of Houellebecq's books main character dedicates his life to studying Huysmans.
>>21306Oh, I'm finishing de Beauvoir's "Le capital" right now and I'm not ready to start another such book. On the other hand, I wanted to read Chomsky's "How the World Works", it seems to be easier reading.
>>21310What is your favorite Hungarian literature?
I also had thoughts about something ancient. Like "Epic of Gilgamesh" (and sci-pop book about Sumerian mythology). Or some Greek playwrights, such as "Oedipus Rex".
No.21325
>>21324> Or some Greek playwrights, such as "Oedipus Rex".Oh fuck right off, I had to read "Antigone" in school.
Ancients and even the 18th/19th century classics are extremely overrated. There, I said it.
No.21326 KONTRA
>>21325They have classic structures and so on but yeah, I could not be bothered either, it's "too far away"
since it is classic structures it is not, really but probably the language No.21327
>>21325>Oh fuck right off, I had to read "Antigone" in school.Do you think one would be able to follow what's happening on stage in a play without having read it beforehands? I'm considering to buy a ticket since I have to kill some time on my holidays before work starts again.
No.21328
>>21324>BTW in one of Houellebecq's books main character dedicates his life to studying Huysmans.Yeah, that's where I heard about him first. I already read and enjoyed À rebours.
>I also had thoughts about something ancient. Like "Epic of Gilgamesh" (and sci-pop book about Sumerian mythology). Or some Greek playwrights, such as "Oedipus Rex".The two particular examples I read already and wouldn't be super interested, but sth else by the Greeks would be cool imo. Mb a comedy by Aristophanes like Lysistrata rather than a tragedy could convince the haters.
No.21329
>>21325>I had to read "Antigone" in school. I don't remember reading anything of antiquity in school. But before 1917 it was a common thing to study ancient Greek language in gymnasiums.
How widespread is classical education in European counties these days?
https://x.com/malmesburyman/status/1482950095578537984 No.21331
>>21324I'd probably go with something by Márai. "Land.. Land!" is really good. Been meaning to read "Peace in Ithaca" for a while now.
I also like Krasznahorkai but I have not read any of his "major" books. The one with the really long title I'm too lazy to look up right now is my favourite from him. I think I have a really basic taste in Hungarian literature.
My favourite authors are just Arany–Babits–Márai. Poeta doctus authors who wrote for the well-mannered, moderately liberal middle-classes, who, aside from Arany suffered from decades of neglect both under nationalism and communism.
Péter Hajnóczy is also good, he was a massive alcoholic but nothing by him is translated I think. But "Death Rode out from Persia" is an amazing short little book.
>>21325>>21329Antigone is kinda mid, along with Oedipus Rex, but "The Wound of Philoctetes" is really fucking good imho.
2bh there's a lot of stuff I'd like to re-read. Crime and Punishment, No Longer Human...
Speaking of Huysmans, I could never get myself to finish A Rebours for some reason. I tried like three times, and each time I ended up failing to finish it.
No.21332 KONTRA
>>21329>How widespread is classical education in European counties these days?Not very.
Afaik here Greek education peaked in the mid 1800s and then it slowly collapsed during the early 1900s when they first replaced it with reading the authors in translation and then removing it from the curriculum altogether except for select institutions where it was necessary, like priest training seminar schools.
Latin education is semi-common, but then again I have a massive selection bias due to the people I have interacted with over my life.
But the was majority of people do not study Greek or Latin. I myself only studied a year of Latin in college because it was obligatory when I joined up, Greek I took a year of out of curiosity but I have forgotten nearly all of it.